They were interviewed, and they said they saw a missile. If 5 different eyewitnesses who were experts in vehicle accidents and driving styles saw you ram another vehicle in traffic, what do you think a judge would conclude?
This is why I can't get into this. Non Sequiturs, Straw man arguments, misdirection, tangents. Been there, done that. Got the T-shirt.
I will not follow you down one rabbit hole after another. Either you got something (like evidence), or you don't. You can spin these stories into a nice package, but at the end of the day, you got squat.