Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bigh4u2
The interesting thing about this prosecutors statement is that he wants Rush to throw away his rights, just so he can find evidence he can use against him.

Um, the prosecutor already found the evidence he needs, Rush and Roy Black are trying to keep it out of Rush's criminal trial.

50 posted on 02/14/2005 2:08:27 PM PST by ClintonBeGone (In politics, sometimes it's OK for even a Wolverine to root for a Buckeye win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: ClintonBeGone

"Um, the prosecutor already found the evidence he needs,"

How so?

By looking at records they had to legal authority to do?

Or by the fact that Rush had two doctors who prescribed the same drugs?

How is that 'evidence of doctor shopping'?


If both doctors prescribed the drugs for differing symptoms, the it isn't.

I have two doctors who prescribe 'inhalers' that I have to use.

One is Atrovent, and the other it Albuterol.

Does that mean I am 'doctor' shopping to find relief?

Not likely.


58 posted on 02/14/2005 2:13:01 PM PST by Bigh4u2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: ClintonBeGone
Um, the prosecutor already found the evidence he needs, Rush and Roy Black are trying to keep it out of Rush's criminal trial.

You have it backwards - the issue is whether the prosecution violated Limbaugh's rights to OBTAIN the evidence.

168 posted on 02/15/2005 12:54:57 PM PST by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson