Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sgt_Schultze

There must be probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed and that the target of the investigation was the one who participated in committing it. It must be more than a suspician based on the fact that someone is a nefareous character.

The investigation must find at least a sufficient basis for obtaining a warrant.

In this case, I believe that the fact of the warrant was not the issue, it was that there is a state statute that specifically required notification of the target of the investigastion when it related to medical records, in particular, so that the target of the investigation could apply to the court before his confidential medical records were reviewed.


32 posted on 02/14/2005 1:57:37 PM PST by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: LachlanMinnesota
That's what I understood. That the prosecutors deliberately circumvented the statutory procedure to obtain the records before Rush or his lawyer knew about it.
48 posted on 02/14/2005 2:06:53 PM PST by colorado tanker (The People Have Spoken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson