2035? Holy .. 'cow'. But isn't that an unrealistically long time? In thirty years your appearance will be a lot different than today. Which makes your DL pretty useless as a photo ID, doesn't it?
Not if you're already 65. How much older-looking can you get? And I think if we're relying on state drivers' license pictures to tell who the terrorists are, we're already in deep doo-doo, aren't we? I mean, we're talking about pulling people over or stopping them from flying after they're inside the country. That's not particularly protective.
And shouldn't Congress only be passing laws that deal with things the states SHOULDN'T handle Constitutionally, say, keeping the states from using federal money on illegals or giving licenses to illegals after they accept federal law enforcement grants? Why do we accept this anti-federalist encroachment when we wouldn't accept it were it from the Rats? Whatever happened to the Contract for America? Can't we do ANY of that stuff NOW instead of this b.s.? Passing the line-item veto alone would help the President refocus the country on what's important. Instead federal 'standards' are being handed down and federal programs to supervise them being kicked off willy-nilly. Real conservative, Congress.