[RaceBannon]

My response directly related the insanity of you defending the random chace argument of evolution and your defense of intelligent humans proving they can randomly choose...and how none of that is related to the open system that evolution demands.

I guess it was above your head or something.

[The Mike Device]

Find where, in my writing, you think I defended evolution at all even once. You seem to be looking for a fight. Have you read one word I've written?
Once again, my point is that IMHO it is possible to model a random or chance process using a man made device be it whirling ping pong balls or a computer.
Whether or not any computer model can actually represent actual evolution is a completely other matter.
Specifically, I don't think that because this experiment was carried out by humans on machines, that it is necessarily tainted because the hand of man was involved.
I think that work like this, while compelling, is not completely convincing.