This sentence leads me to believe you didn't read me at all, let alone correctly.
I'm saying her actions were the domestic equivalent of Jane Fonda's trip to Hanoi. All the sound and fury over her sexual proclivities is an attempt to employ the "McGreeney defense," against the sanctions she's suffered for it. Though reflexively, said proclivities are sufficient to warrent the same reaction.
One is left with a simple choice. You can believe Keyes is a blatant hypocrite, or that his daughter is being somewhat disingenuous. I choose to give benefit of the doubt to the party that doesn't celebrate sodomy.
I can believe both, easily.
Keyes is clearly a hypocrite since he commented on Cheney's daughter without acknowledging his own daughter was the same. Saved him some embarrassment during the campaign.
I also consider his reparations explanations disingenuous.
I don't have enough data, but what I do have leaves room for the daughter to be disingenous also. I'd like to know who funded her trip, since she had been fired and was also "homeless".