How nice. Ad hominems.
A civil person engaged in polite discourse, when confronted with my statement that I'm not aware of any changes in Dick Cheney's position on homosexuality, would have responsed with evidence to the contrary, if he/she had any.
I'll take your insults as an admission that you have no evidence to back up your claim that Dick Cheney changed his views on homosexuality.
I said you were only aware of bits and pieces. Am I wrong?
I also said your biases color and control what you know. Am I wrong? Are you superhuman, infallible in judgment?