[Rightwing Conspiratr1]

Then why didn't he? He had a live microphone in his hand. He could have informed the world while he was busy talking about Mary Cheney.

I suppose if you were the reporter interviewing Keyes on the topic of queer marriage you would have asked more intelligent and probing questions for your headline, like "Does this mean Liberace was a selfish hedonist?" or perhaps "Does this mean Rock Hudson was a selfish hedonist?"

Those who are intellectually honest know who brought up Mary Cheney and why, and who was otulining a position on queer marriage. Your head is jammed up the twin rear ends of "party uber alles" and the Bush/Cheney cult, and I quite expect your rendevous with intellectual honesty are as rare and brief as a typical liberal's are.

[Howlin]

Those who are intellectually honest know who brought up Mary Cheney and why, and who was otulining a position on queer marriage.

What does what the reporter asked have to do with Keyes' reply????????

Are you admitting for all to see that he's too stupid to NOT KNOW when he's being set up?

Or is it that the reporter was smarter than Keyes -- he had to know the answer he would get from Keyes; it's not OUR fault Keyes jumped at the chance to pontificate!

Your head is jammed up the twin rear ends of "party uber alles" and the Bush/Cheney cult, and I quite expect your rendevous with intellectual honesty are as rare and brief as a typical liberal's are.

BOILERPLATE CLAPTRAP uttered to ANYBODY who can see through Alan Keyes' cultlike hold on you people.