Skip to comments.
Ban me Jim [Re: Illegal Immigration, ALIPAC and the Minuteman Project]
Hoverbug
Posted on 02/13/2005 11:56:57 PM PST by Hoverbug
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320, 321-340, 341-360 ... 381-400 next last
To: xzins
xzins asks:
what's your vision for the future of Mexico..
____________________________________
Eventually, regardless of what we do, the situation in Mexico will explode.
We should get prepared, and then let it happen.
I see the 'guest workers' exodus [and their money sent home] as a safety valve.
-- Mexico is ripe for revolution, and our government is playing games at our border in an attempt to delay the inevitable.
The present 'goal', it seems, is to prevent a revolution in Mexico by allowing a relatively open border.
-- Yet no one here wants an open border, or so it is claimed.
321
posted on
02/14/2005 9:16:32 PM PST
by
P_A_I
To: Hoverbug
It is fitting that your name contains "bug."
322
posted on
02/14/2005 9:17:40 PM PST
by
doug from upland
(Ray Charles --- a great musician and safer driver than Ted Kennedy)
To: Witch Hazel
You've been wasting your time watching the MSM's liberal spin.
Comment #324 Removed by Moderator
To: Witch Hazel
Hell for all practical purposes, the Mexicans have already won. Read their website.
Of course they are reading stormfront.org, so that cancels your big gripe, no?
Comment #326 Removed by Moderator
To: Witch Hazel
Scandalous! So does that justify other people's bigotry and racism? "Everyone does it, and therefore it's okay if *I* do it" is a shakey foundation for morality.
Comment #328 Removed by Moderator
To: k2blader
And if you want to know more about the racist right, go ahead and delve into it.
329
posted on
02/14/2005 10:00:18 PM PST
by
phoenix0468
(One man with courage is a majority. (Andrew Jackson))
To: Salem
330
posted on
02/14/2005 11:40:39 PM PST
by
lainde
( ...we are not European, we are American, and we have different principles!")
To: Witch Hazel
California went from 100% Anglo to 50% Brown in a little less than 20 years.
When was California 100% (or even 90%) Anglo?
331
posted on
02/15/2005 12:44:42 AM PST
by
dr_pat
("The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has limits." --Einstein)
To: Salem
Thank you thank you. I'm taking a bow now.
332
posted on
02/15/2005 4:44:20 AM PST
by
Conspiracy Guy
(Reading is fundamental. Comprehension is optional.)
To: Salem
hahahahah.. thanks for the ping. I loved the beeber asoc on the road.
333
posted on
02/15/2005 4:50:21 AM PST
by
lupie
To: P_A_I; P-Marlowe
Agree with it or not, I'm still an advocate of a North/Central American hegemony, if not actual union, of nations. Manifest destiny wasn't such a bad idea, imho.
The US in control all the way down the isthmus with everything north being part of the union is the best idea, so far as I'm concerned. To include the major Gulf & Caribbean Islands. (Carter made a stupid Panama decision and Kennedy never should have allowed Cuba to fall. They were, and/or should have been, ours.)
Mexico's population will approach that of the US by then end of this century if nothing changes. They're coming to the US whether we like it or not. We might as well get to keep their government, too.
Now I'm in trouble.....flame away!
334
posted on
02/15/2005 5:17:06 AM PST
by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
To: xzins
Eventually, regardless of what we do, the situation in Mexico will explode.
We should get prepared, and then let it happen.
I see the 'guest workers' exodus [and their money sent home] as a safety valve.
-- Mexico is ripe for revolution, and our government is playing games at our border in an attempt to delay the inevitable.
The present 'goal', it seems, is to prevent a revolution in Mexico by allowing a relatively open border.
-- Yet no one here wants an open border, or so it is claimed.
P_A_I
____________________________________
Agree with it or not, I'm still an advocate of a North/Central American hegemony, if not actual union, of nations. Manifest destiny wasn't such a bad idea, imho.
The US in control all the way down the isthmus with everything north being part of the union is the best idea, so far as I'm concerned.
xzins
Yep, although big bros current 'plan' seems to be a EU style union, -- not an enlarged USA.
-- Which leaves the question, what happens to our individual Constitutional rights, our republic, in such an 'economic union'?
The answer is obvious, and is already being put into effect in DC. -- Our Constitution is ignored.
335
posted on
02/15/2005 5:44:11 AM PST
by
P_A_I
To: Witch Hazel
I went there. They hate the Jewish people. Boycotting Kosher food is at the top of their list. "Kosher Nostra"? Hitler would have been proud...
sw
336
posted on
02/15/2005 6:01:44 AM PST
by
spectre
(Spectre's wife)
To: P_A_I
Enlarged US is the way to go.
337
posted on
02/15/2005 6:14:30 AM PST
by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
To: stands2reason
I think you can come up with a better word than "pimp" to convey your thought, huh?
Comment #339 Removed by Moderator
To: Jim Robinson
Ok... I checked it out. I feel like I need a shower after wading through that much filth. However, my previous points stand.
If Hillary Clinton suddenly starts backing the Presidents Social Security plan, should we drop our support for it? It's the same deal.
340
posted on
02/15/2005 6:44:02 AM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(The neighborhood is pretty dead at night, and I'm the one to blame....)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320, 321-340, 341-360 ... 381-400 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson