Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Iwo Jima

You don't know much about the bill yet - that's fine. You'd do well to take a look at it.


395 posted on 02/15/2005 10:51:47 AM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 381 | View Replies ]


To: Principled
You don't know much about the bill yet - that's fine. You'd do well to take a look at it.

You might want to read the bill as well. You have previously stated that "used property" is any property on which tax has been paid. However, the bill in Section 2. Definitions (a)(16)defines USED PROPERTY to mean (A) property on which the tax has been collected AND "B) property that was held other than for a business purpose(as defined in section 102(b))on December 31, 2006."

So, houses, cars, and other non-business property existing as of 12/31/06 would never be subject to the NRST. Correct?
410 posted on 02/15/2005 11:21:15 AM PST by Iwo Jima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 395 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson