This is for those who collect and remit - retailers. There is nothing indicating individuals need receipts.
But anyone who is liable is responsible for remitting tax. If the new and improved government tax collection agency (Not the IRS though!) decides they think you are liable for tax and did not rimit it, you can bet you sweet cheeks that they are gonna audit you. Hey you, driving that new foreign car, let me see your sales receipt. That's all they need to say, and you have the burden to produce it. I am not sure what fantasy land you are living on if you somehow believe individuals can not and will not be audited. All they have to do is think you 'may be liable to collect and remit' and they can audit you. Go through ALL your records, make sure you paid taxes on all the goods and services your used or provided. There is absolutely nothing to stop them.
This is for those who collect and remit - retailers. There is nothing indicating individuals need receipts.
If they get that warrant first they may inquire but no warrant no lookee for the individual not engaged as a certified business.
Unlike the current federal tax statutes, presumption of innocence and presumption of lawful behavior are explicitly required of the state tax autorities in HR25, above and beyond Constitutional 4th & 5th amendment protections the federal IRS is so ready to ignore:
H.R.25Fair Tax Act of 2005 (Introduced in House)
`SECTION 1. PRINCIPLES OF INTERPRETATION.`(a) IN GENERAL- Any court, the Secretary, and any sales tax administering authority shall consider the purposes of this subtitle (as set forth in subsection (b)) as the primary aid in statutory construction. `(b) PURPOSES- The purposes of this subtitle are as follows:
`(c) SECONDARY AIDS TO STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION- As a secondary aid in statutory construction, any court, the Secretary, and any sales tax administering authority shall consider--
|