Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Always Right
No matter how clear it is, there is not one NRSTer who is honest enough to admit what the bill clearly says.

No one is denying that the bill says that. However, what you seem to be denying is that you have the context of that section incorrect -- it is only in reference to those already required to file reports, not to everyday retail purchases. In other words, depite your claim, John Doe does not have to produce receipts for his purchases.

375 posted on 02/15/2005 9:58:30 AM PST by kevkrom (If people are free to do as they wish, they are almost certain not to do as Utopian planners wish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies ]


To: kevkrom
No one is denying that the bill says that. However, what you seem to be denying is that you have the context of that section incorrect -- it is only in reference to those already required to file reports, not to everyday retail purchases. In other words, depite your claim, John Doe does not have to produce receipts for his purchases.

No, the requirement to produce records in context says, "`In all disputes concerning taxes imposed by this subtitle, the person engaged in a dispute with the sales tax administering authority or the Secretary, as the case may be, shall have the burden of production of documents and records but the sales tax administering authority or the Secretary shall have the burden of persuasion." This doesn't say only those who are required to file reports, this say "In all disputes concerning taxes imposed". Geez.

380 posted on 02/15/2005 10:02:25 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson