Skip to comments.
Eason Jordan affair: when bloggers appear as the sons of Senator McCarthy
Editor's Weblog ^
| 2/12/05
| Bertrand Pecquerie
Posted on 02/13/2005 9:21:49 AM PST by Brian Mosely
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
raising questions about the Bush administration policy in Iraq...?????
I don't even know where to begin...
To: Brian Mosely
Bertrand Pecquerie at your service:
2
posted on
02/13/2005 9:23:57 AM PST
by
Enterprise
("Dance with the Devil by the Pale Moonlight" - Islam compels you!)
To: Brian Mosely
Of course Senator McCarthy was actually right.
To: Brian Mosely
Perhaps Eason should have immediately released a transcript.
4
posted on
02/13/2005 9:24:16 AM PST
by
doug from upland
(Ray Charles --- a great musician and safer driver than Ted Kennedy)
To: Brian Mosely
Senator McCarthy was right.
To: Brian Mosely
"the defense of the US army honor seemed more important to some bloggers than the defense of reporters' work" In the case of that creep -- yes.
6
posted on
02/13/2005 9:25:42 AM PST
by
BenLurkin
(Liberals hate liberty.)
To: Enterprise
By the way, Bertrand Pecquerie is Director of the World Editors Forum, which is the editors organization within the World Association of Newspapers.
Just lovely.
7
posted on
02/13/2005 9:25:52 AM PST
by
Brian Mosely
(A government is a body of people -- usually notably ungoverned)
To: Brian Mosely
Hey, all we ask for is proof of his claims.
Why would he say it if he didn't believe it was true?
If he believed it was true then what does he base that belief on?
Since he could not prove it he proves himself to be too reckless an idealogue to have anything to do with objective news reporting.
To: Brian Mosely
Hugh Hewitt played a huge role in making this story remain in the spotlight.
9
posted on
02/13/2005 9:27:10 AM PST
by
Andy from Beaverton
(I only vote Republican to stop the Democrats)
To: Brian Mosely
I don't even know where to begin... Yes..when the first words that come to mind are treasonous seditious scumbags, its hard to progress from that point.
10
posted on
02/13/2005 9:27:26 AM PST
by
evad
To: Brian Mosely
11
posted on
02/13/2005 9:27:37 AM PST
by
BenLurkin
(Liberals hate liberty.)
To: Brian Mosely

Another variety of Pecquerie.
To: Brian Mosely
So where's the transcript? Who has it? Why are they refusing to release it?
The guy said something that made Barney Frank flinch and he doesn't want us to know what it was. Then he resigns. This seems a pretty good indication that the bloggers have it exactly right.
If it had actually been anything that wasn't traitorous, it would have been released before now.
13
posted on
02/13/2005 9:28:01 AM PST
by
Poser
(Joining Belly Girl in the Pajamahadeen)
To: Brian Mosely
Journalists are desperately afraid that they will now be held accountable for the things they write and say.
This isn't the way it was supposed to be. Journalists are supposed to hold others accountable, not be held accountable themselves.
14
posted on
02/13/2005 9:28:06 AM PST
by
ScottFromSpokane
(http://drunkengop.blogspot.com/)
To: Run Silent Run Deep
"Within the honest community of bloggers, some of them claimed to be the "sons of the First Amendment", they just were the sons of Senator McCarthy." You have a very good point. Don't debate, don't counter with facts, just call people names.
15
posted on
02/13/2005 9:29:58 AM PST
by
Enterprise
("Dance with the Devil by the Pale Moonlight" - Islam compels you!)
To: Brian Mosely
Bertrand Pecquerie's response is what I would expect from roaches (creeping in the dark) when uncovered in the spotlight of truth. Run for cover.
16
posted on
02/13/2005 9:30:05 AM PST
by
auboy
(Saying and doing are often miles apart.)
To: Brian Mosely
"quickly walked that back to make it clear that there was no policy on the part of the U.S. government to target or injure journalists,"
Notice how he didn't "walk it back" to say journalists were not targeted by the military - only that there was no government policy to target journalists.
No matter how much you polish it, a turd is still a turd.
17
posted on
02/13/2005 9:30:50 AM PST
by
RtWngr
(Being tolerant of the intolerant is pretty stupid actually.)
To: Brian Mosely
Bertrand Pecquerie neglects to mention that even Barny Franks was questioning Jordan at that Davos session about his over-the-wall comments regarding the U.S. military.
And why is it the Jordan's Davos comments hasn't/won't be released? A man falsely accused would be the first to demand that the tape be released. The tape must be really bad, so bad that it can't be publicly released, and the MSM trying to circle their broken wagons is an interesting spectacle.
18
posted on
02/13/2005 9:31:00 AM PST
by
xJones
To: Brian Mosely
What kinda name is Peckeri?
I take issue with this name.
He should be fired.
19
posted on
02/13/2005 9:31:37 AM PST
by
Cold Heat
(What are fears but voices awry?Whispering harm where harm is not and deluding the unwary. Wordsworth)
To: Brian Mosely

An earnest Bertrand Pecquerie [center], expounding on his views in a one-on-one setting.
20
posted on
02/13/2005 9:31:37 AM PST
by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
(I feel more and more like a revolted Charlton Heston, witnessing ape society for the very first time)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson