To: Californiajones
The north didn't treat African-Americans all that much better than the South. Oh and what about the thousands of blacks who also owned slaves?
What Lincoln did ended up giving the left the excuse and precedent they needed to have the Feds take over everything.
6 posted on
02/12/2005 10:45:58 PM PST by
GeronL
(I'm thinking, I'm thinking!)
To: GeronL
The north didn't treat African-Americans all that much better than the South. Oh and what about the thousands of blacks who also owned slaves? Neither of those points has any bearing on the rectitude of slavery as it existed at the time in question or the desirability of eliminating it or preventing its expansion.
17 posted on
02/13/2005 3:04:08 AM PST by
Mr Ramsbotham
(Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
To: GeronL
You may be right about how individual blacks were treated by Northerners etc., however Lincoln believed, and stated as such, that the war was essentially over the sin and stain of slavery -- as it stained the promise of the Declaration that all men are created equal.
Lincoln believed that the blood shed in the Civil War was just due because of the terrible moral wrong of slavery.
23 posted on
02/13/2005 12:25:52 PM PST by
Californiajones
("The apprehension of beauty is the cure for apathy" - Thomas Aquinas)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson