So perhaps we arent so far apart after all.
I can characterize the difference between us as this: you are focusing on the physical, visible effects of the communication happening - whereas I am focused on the causation and then the successful communication itself.
Both the cause (will to live) and the successful communication (Shannon information) are constructs which apply to all living molecular machinery.
Because constructs are fully transportable they can be (and are) analyzed and modeled independently of their application. This is an "unreasonable effectiveness of math" that we can apply Shannon communication theory across a wide variety of disciplines.
Likewise, quantum field theory may help us to understand the "will to live" - causation. Universal applicability to the biosphere (amoeba to whale, kidney to cardiovascular, plants to animals) is what suggests that the will to live the causation is field-like.
You also said:
AG:No. I would classify it as the effect of a cause.
Interesting. I am not sure science at this point and time can address what is beyond the cause of the electrostatic forces (which drive everything in biology).
How does one get more of a handle on this cause?