"But evolution is science by definition, because the process of deriving it was scientific."
I don't think the impact of Annie Darwin's death on Charles Darwin was part of the scientific process. I do think, however, that given Annie was 10 years old, and that Charles Darwin adored her at the time of her death, that Charles may have decided that hating God and writing him out of existence was easier than trying to make sense of the loss of a child.
Oh, how silly.
One of the most ridiculous arguments is that evolution is anti-God.
In my opinion, ID and creationism are anti-God. Because:
Anything that diminishes God is anti-God. Creationism and ID dimish the true creation. They make it smaller and less wonderful.
My view of you and other creationists is, if you beg the presumption: When you go to Heaven (and I will stipulate that you are probably good people and will), God will say: "Welcome gobucks, you were a good person. However, that ID and creationism thing. Well, do you really think that was the best I could do???"
"I don't think the impact of Annie Darwin's death on Charles Darwin was part of the scientific process. I do think, however, that given Annie was 10 years old, and that Charles Darwin adored her at the time of her death, that Charles may have decided that hating God and writing him out of existence was easier than trying to make sense of the loss of a child."
I've seen you toss this crap out before. It's so irrelevant that any idiot could see that. I lost a son at birth due to a terribly tragic medical "accident" a few years ago. It affects my science not one ultramicroscopic bit. That you would use this against Darwin shows how desperate you are and how intellectually challenged you are and how thoughtless you are. Keep these topics for psychobabble threads.