[bvw]

Well thanks, maybe.

Goggling "SocialText" takes me to a forum/blogger workgroup software site called socialtext. They have some blogs they list, of which the ones I looked at were Deaniacs or affines.

Also one blogger who covers modern neuroscience, possibly of interest to Junior. See

http://www.socialtext.com/weblog/2005February.html

&

http://www.corante.com/brainwaves/

[js1138]

I had this in mind.

They published this, so I thought they'd be interested in your views.

[js1138]

I mean, can you really distinguish this:

but more potently the design and parmeterization of processes, which processes may appear in the small to be random, but that are subject to a crafty process that engenders the desired result. The intelligence may be so subtle that its processes avoid discrete detection -- are not possible to distinquish from chaos, yet in aggregate it is design.

from this:

...``a complete elucidation of one and the same object may require diverse points of view which defy a unique description'' -- this is quite simply a fact about the world, much as the self-proclaimed empiricists of modernist science might prefer to deny it. In such a situation, how can a self-perpetuating secular priesthood of credentialed ``scientists'' purport to maintain a monopoly on the production of scientific knowledge?