Maybe you are unto something. But, maybe you just not looking at what you don't want to see.
" [10] Loss and Remembering - Annie's funeral, affects of her death on the family, Darwin's memorial to Annie.
[11] The Destroying Angel - Analysis of the cause of Annie's death
[12] The Origin of Species - Darwin's loss of faith, publication of "Origin of Species", public reactions to the Origin.
From "Annie's Box: Charles Darwin, his Daughter, and Human Evolution "
From here: http://www.aboutdarwin.com/literature/Review.html
And this book, is from a Keynes ancestor .... you know, the econo dude the liberals love to love ....
I suppose you have one of these irrelevant stories about Alfred Russel Wallace, too and the many thousands of scientists since who have presented evidence for evolution (myself included).
Wake up man. 99.9% of the evidence for evolution is post Darwin. You only pick on Darwin the man because you cannot pick on the actual science. Would you beat on Wallace, if he had beaten Darwin into print? I am ready for your anti-Wallacism posts. I know you need a whipping boy, since it's easier to make things personal than to dispute fact with nothing.
Evolutionists don't pick on Behe on a personal basis, but based on his lack of science and own published word. If his mother had taken too many drugs while she was pregnant and created some chromosome abnormalities in him to make the intellectual monster that he is, it would not be mentioned here. It is irrlelvant.
I can personally guarantee you that evolution would be where it is right now with or without Darwin and possibly further along.