put it this way without arguing the minutia.....Davis was bad, McClintock was good, Bustamante was bad, Arnold was in the middle and the most likely to win......I won't argue the finer points with you now......I'm having too much fun conversing with tolerant FR's here....I note your displeasure with Arnold......carry on
You seem to want to quickly label those whose opinions you do not share as being intolerant and to avoid giving support for your contentions. If state spending, property rights, and borrowing are minutia, what do you find to be relevant?
You said Arnold has made progress. I asked how. It's a simple question. I'm not reliving the election; Bustamante, Davis, and McClintock are not relevant to my question. I'm talking about from November 2003 forward.
In contrast, I cited examples that have pushed us further to the left, negative progress.
Why do you participate in a "discussion" forum, if you aren't willing to engage in discussion?
"I'm having too much fun conversing with tolerant FR's here...."
We are also "pragmatic, sensible conservatives, who are grounded in reality", in addition to being tolerant towards the vicious little "all or nothing" promoters, who vastly prefer nothing to something, and they never learned, that "It's better to light one candle, than curse the darkness". They keep trying to put out the candle, to return us to full darkness and Democrat dominance.