Posted on 02/11/2005 9:13:07 PM PST by SmithL
The skipper of the nuclear-powered submarine that crashed into the side of an undersea mountain is quietly being sent before an admirals mast in Japan this weekend to face charges of endangering his ship, according to several active-duty and retired Navy sources familiar with the case.
Cmdr. Kevin Mooney was slated to appear before 7th Fleet commander Vice Adm. Jonathan W. Greenert in Yokosuka on Saturday morning, the sources said.
The Navys highest form of nonjudicial punishment, admirals mast falls short of the criminal proceedings of a court martial, but can result in anything from full exoneration to fines, reprimands, and loss of qualifications.
Publicly, Navy officials decline to comment on Mooneys case.
It would be inappropriate to discuss any nonjudicial punishment proceedings at this time, said Greenerts spokesman, Cmdr. Ike Skelton.
On Jan. 18, the San Francisco, a Los Angeles-class, fast-attack submarine, is believed to have rammed into an undersea mountain 350 nautical miles south of its homeport at Guam. One sailor was killed and another 23 injured in the incident.
The sub suffered massive damage to its sonar dome and bow structure, but was able to limp back to Guam where it is now in dry dock. Navy officials are still unsure if the sub can be salvaged.
Mooneys mast, however, comes before the detailed investigation into the accident is complete. And unlike most nonjudicial punishment throughout the rest of the military, sailors from sea-going commands cannot refuse mast and demand a court- martial.
At issue, say officials, is whether charts supplied to Mooney provided any clue of dangerous waters. Officials at the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency in Bethesda, told reporters after the accident that the main maps used by the U.S. Navy did not reveal any obstacle anywhere near the sight of the crash.
Officials familiar with case, however, say another, much older chart was believed to be aboard the San Francisco indicating discolored water several miles away.
Early findings of the Navys investigation appear to indicate some level of questionable practices by Mooney, according to a Feb. 7 letter obtained by Stars and Stripes to Greenert from the commander of Pacific submarine forces Rear Adm. P.F. Sullivan.
Preliminary findings of the grounding, reads the letter, highlights the questionable Voyage Planning processes and navigation practices Cdr. Kevin Mooney implemented and maintained while in command. He was responsible for the safe surfaced and submerged navigation of the ship, and should be held accountable.
Still, the vast majority of the three-page letter outlines Mooneys many accomplishments while in command of the San Francisco.
Sullivan said he had personally selected Mooney to correct significant command climate and performance issues aboard the ship.
Since taking command in late 2003, Sullivan said Mooney was directly responsible for transforming a down-in-the-dumps crew into one of the best in the fleet.
The ship, he wrote, got the highest marks of any Pacific submarine in a grueling Tactical Readiness Evaluation, among other top line certifications of its nuclear propulsion system and engineering departments.
Mooneys operational planning skill and command presence ensured the ships success in dynamic operations of vital importance to national security, adds Sullivan.
In the face of huge quality-of-life challenges faced by his ship, including a five-month deployment to San Diego for material repairs and transforming Guam into a viable submarine homeport, retention and reenlistment rates significantly exceed fleet norms under Mooney, writes Sullivan.
Despite the intense scrutiny under which he has been placed as a result of this tragedy, Cmdr. Mooney has conducted himself with honor and dignity. I ask that you consider his positive contributions to the U.S. Navy during your deliberations at Admirals Mast.
A source says Cmdr. Kevin Mooney, above, is slated to appear before 7th Fleet commander Vice Adm. Jonathan W. Greenert in Yokosuka on Saturday morning in connection with the Jan. 8 grounding of the USS San Francisco, shown below in dry dock at U.S. Naval Base Guam.
USS San Francisco Ping
This is a good thing, yes?
Better that a court martial?
His career's over. Perhaps should be.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1341628/posts
They have better software that that!
NO, no, no and no.
Just a guess: The damage control department fared pretty well too.
well darn!.....must be why the Greenville speared that
fishing trawler / fisheries educational vessel.
Based on the rest of your post, that statement is redundant.
I think so ;)
Face the Admiral's mast? Don't ask, don't tell.
I believe it goes this way: At the completion of Article 32 (the investigation) there is always a Commanding Officer or Admiral's Mast (like going in front of a magistrate or a judge or a justice of the peace in civilian terms). He can resolve it, or send it on to a Court Martial
Unless it was a mighty noisy mountain, passive sonar never would have heard it.
This is a shame. The man dedicated his life to the Navy and this nation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.