Replies

I'm getting more and more interested in the Senate Democratic Policy Committee meeting in May 2003. This is where the whole scheme may have been cooked up.

You guys remember the Rockefeller Memo?? It was leaked to Hannity around 11/2003. The point was to politicize intel to take down Bush.

full text of the memo

Barbara Stanley Memogate

Also:

Keep in mind the the first time Berger went to the archives... July 18,2003.

After looking at the dates from the Scarboro Country show transcript http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5472936/, when they were discussing Sandy Berger's visits to the National Archives, something just jogged my memory of the ROCKEFELLER plan to take the President down with a surprise investigation.

I think Berger has GOT to be involved in the Rockefeller Memo scheme .. Let us not forget that Kerry brought him on as an advisor for a while, then suddenly, Mr. I HAVEN'T HAD THE TIME to take WH Terror briefings was talking about port security...etc..

Anyway, to your original question of what went on at the 5/2003 meeting, the timing of what followed is rather curious.

Thanks for the links, JJ. I thank everyone, in fact for their links and data. This entire event is part of a larger pattern which continues to be used by Democrats, IME.

Peripheral links:

http://www.wisconsinproject.org/pubs/articles/1999/lithotripter.html

My question is: Why and who wanted to float a story in order to focus on Africa, and not other countries?

http://www.washtimes.com/commentary/20040322-082826-7678r.htm

----------------

And these other two:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1045272/posts>

http://www.nationalreview.com/ledeen/ledeen200407120941.asp

It becomes increasingly clear, reading a ton of data, someone wanted attention focused away from specific countries and with focus paid to Africa where the "at that time" issue was concerned with "harboring" of terrorists; but not specifically upon uranium. The directional focus of "who outted Valerie Plame" is the hunt directional. Aimed at the Bush Admin. And as I panned story after story.. search after search.. it is patently, overwhelmingly obvious there are efforts to take down not just the President, but the WH Cabinet and Admin. From Gary Hart taking potshots at Rice to demands for Rumsfeld to resign over "abu ghraib".

The point is to focus on Who Outted Valerie Plame. right. It most certainly is a breach of security, but I don't think it came from the WH. Why would they shoot themselves in the foot? They have absolutely nothing to gain through the Plame "outting" and the attention being focused on Africa but not other "certain" nations, and at that particular time.