To: followerofchrist
The reason we are all so similar is because of the DESIGNER, not the design. He was lazy and left unnecessary and/or poorly designed components in, just because that's what the template was set for? Remind me again why He didn't both to design a spinal column better suited to bipedalism?
51 posted on
02/11/2005 8:35:44 AM PST by
Alter Kaker
(Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
To: Alter Kaker
Remind me again why He didn't both to design a spinal column better suited to bipedalism?Interesting! I've never heard that one before. I've spoken to people with Ph.D's about the spine and the structure of the spinal column and they have said that the design and robustness of it is remarkable.
59 posted on
02/11/2005 8:47:48 AM PST by
Michael_Michaelangelo
(The best theory is not ipso facto a good theory. Lots of links on my homepage...)
To: Alter Kaker
He was lazy and left unnecessary and/or poorly designed components in, just because that's what the template was set for? Remind me again why He didn't both to design a spinal column better suited to bipedalism? You've moved into the realm of philosophy...don't be surprised if someone proffers you a philosophical answer.
81 posted on
02/11/2005 9:33:15 AM PST by
Oberon
(What does it take to make government shrink?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson