Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Elpasser
Agree. Evolutionists have to deal with many stubborn facts. Such as the predominance of sexual reproduction. How would a successfully mutated individual advantage its offspring by mating with a non-mutated individual and diluting or eliminating its genetic advantage in that offspring?

My biggest problem with natural selection as a process to explain speciation is the lack of mutagens. If the genetic dice are being re-rolled every time another individual animal is conceived, thus giving rise to new and potentially useful structures that promote that individual's survival, then...well...where are the mutations, and what's driving the process?

If you roll a six-sided die and get a seven, it's for a reason. I'm open-minded as to what the reason might be, but I am convinced that there must be one. Random mutation alone doesn't seem to me regular enough to result in speciation, particularly when random mutation usually results in fatal defects in individuals.

46 posted on 02/11/2005 8:30:56 AM PST by Oberon (What does it take to make government shrink?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: Oberon

"explain speciation is the lack of mutagens."

Mutations occur randomly at particular frequencies (typical frequencies are 10^-6 to 10^-7) without mutagens. All mutagens do is increase the frequencies of natural mutations.

IOW you don't need mutagens to get mutations.


75 posted on 02/11/2005 9:25:01 AM PST by furball4paws ("These are Microbes."... "You have crobes?" BC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson