Agreed. But can the scientific community (such as it is) tell the difference?
Let's use you as an example. What are the two are three biggest weaknesses of the modern evolutionary synthesis?
"What are the two are three biggest weaknesses of the modern evolutionary synthesis?"
I don't think there are any serious weaknesses. If there were, evolution would not be a scientific theory.
There are areas where more information is desireable, like the Precambrian fossil record. But it is unlikely that a huge amount of fossils will be discovered from that period, in any event.