Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Giving "Gannon" a pass (How he avoided background check)
Salon ^ | 2/11/05

Posted on 02/11/2005 6:45:45 AM PST by KidGlock

Giving "Gannon" a pass

Questions remain about how a fake reporter working for a fake news operation got White House press credentials without a background check.

By Eric Boehlert

Feb. 11, 2005 | Before abruptly quitting his post this week as White House correspondent for the GOP-friendly group Talon News, Jeff Gannon enjoyed unfettered access to White House briefings.

He gained that access not by going through the normal full background check most journalists face when obtaining a "hard pass," the ultimate White House credential, but rather by getting day passes, which require only an abbreviated background check.

According to one current member of the White House press corps, Gannon was the only reporter to skirt the rules that way, obtaining daily passes month after month for nearly two years.

"Why did the White House circumvent the process for him?" asks the White House reporter.

(rest of article needs subscription)

(Excerpt) Read more at salon.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: gannon; jeffgannon; presscorps; talonnews
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Talon News reporter "Jeff Gannon" lobs White House spokesman Scott McClellan a question at a Feb. 1 press briefing.

1 posted on 02/11/2005 6:45:45 AM PST by KidGlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KidGlock

Half of Clinton's West Wing staff avoided background checks.


2 posted on 02/11/2005 6:48:00 AM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KidGlock

How is Eason Jordan getting a free pass? When the MSM answers that, I will care about Jeff Gannon. If I were the White House, I would admit someone to replace Gannon immediately. Hell, I would admit ten people to replace Gannon or Gucker or whatever the hell his name is.


3 posted on 02/11/2005 6:49:43 AM PST by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KidGlock

Obviuosly the guy was a Rove plant, lets be real. According to DU he is also Bush's lover, so why wouldn' he get a pass?

This is a pretty pathetic and lame attack by the lefties. A conservative reporter of a conservative news org getting a pass from a conservative adminstration...the horror!!!


4 posted on 02/11/2005 6:50:31 AM PST by Pondman88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KidGlock

"According to one current member of the White House press corps, Gannon was the only reporter to skirt the rules that way, obtaining daily passes month after month for nearly two years."


http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000798573

Several reporters pointed to Russell Mokhiber, editor of Corporate Crime Reporter, who has been attending press events through a daily press pass for several years. Some say he is as partisan as Gannon in his questions, but often with a left-leaning approach. One reporter called him "the ideological flip-side of Gannon."


jeez, that took all of 30 seconds.


5 posted on 02/11/2005 6:50:55 AM PST by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KidGlock
He gained that access not by going through the normal full background check most journalists face when obtaining a "hard pass," the ultimate White House credential, but rather by getting day passes, which require only an abbreviated background check.

And many punks in the Clinton administration got perfunctory background checks. A gaggle of national security risks.

6 posted on 02/11/2005 6:52:11 AM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

And quite frankly, the press briefing room needs people like Jeff Gannon and Russell Mokhiber, just to shake up the cynical and lock-step old-school media types.


7 posted on 02/11/2005 6:53:26 AM PST by kevkrom (If people are free to do as they wish, they are almost certain not to do as Utopian planners wish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus

You are so correct. DeDe could never had gotten one and I doubt if Stephy could have either. Colonel Craig Livingstone may have passed them up though.


8 posted on 02/11/2005 6:56:50 AM PST by gunnedah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KidGlock

Why so much attention on Gannon and so little on Eason Jordan?


9 posted on 02/11/2005 7:00:04 AM PST by FreedomSurge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KidGlock
Questions remain about how a fake reporter working for a fake news operation

Exactly what is a fake reporter and a fake news operation?

I read his reporting on their operations website. Seemed real to me.

10 posted on 02/11/2005 7:04:58 AM PST by Lost Highway (http://www.therightbrothers.com The Right Brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
jeez, that took all of 30 seconds

ROFL!

AND, you did it in your jammies. :)

11 posted on 02/11/2005 7:06:24 AM PST by MamaLucci (Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KidGlock
Ok these two sentences are almost right next to each other.

got White House press credentials without a background check.

He gained that access not by going through the normal full background check most journalists face when obtaining a "hard pass," the ultimate White House credential, but rather by getting day passes, which require only an abbreviated background check.

So he got around the background check by going through a background check. Man this guy is sneaky!

12 posted on 02/11/2005 7:10:46 AM PST by Lost Highway (http://www.therightbrothers.com The Right Brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KidGlock

Sentence #1: A lie. Gannon didn't have unfettered access to the WH.


13 posted on 02/11/2005 7:18:38 AM PST by Peach (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Sentence #1: A lie. Gannon didn't have unfettered access to the WH.

Selective editing on your part. The article did not say unfettered access to the WH, it said unfettered access to White House Briefings. You're usually pretty good about sticking to exact phraseology. You let this one slip.

14 posted on 02/11/2005 8:02:51 AM PST by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus
Half of Clinton's West Wing staff avoided background checks.

Well over 300 of them.

15 posted on 02/11/2005 8:08:53 AM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

Actually I just left the word briefings off accidentally. He didn't even have unfettered access to White House Press Briefings, considering that he had to apply daily for a pass.


16 posted on 02/11/2005 8:41:22 AM PST by Peach (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Peach
I think the issue is someone operating under an alias (and the alias may have been used to get credentials....we don't know for sure) was able to gain access to an area of the White House on a regular basis where most people would be denied access. No one is sure why the person was using an alias. While it is not uncommon for on air talent or even print media personalities and reporters to assume an alias, their real name is commonly known in the industry.

I know that Gannon is considered friendly and as such is getting a pass from most Freepers. My quesiton is, if he were hostile to this administration, would we be so easy on the situation? I think not.

I wonder if today Jeff Gannon applied for a day pass if he would receive one? I bet he wouldn't.

17 posted on 02/11/2005 12:01:59 PM PST by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

Jeff Gannon told Wolf Blitzer last night that he applied for his WH press pass under his real name.

I also don't imagine why I'd be mad at a liberal getting a press pass under a different name. Lots of them changed their names. Mike Wallace. Larry King.

He hasn't done anything wrong, except ask a decidedly conservative question of the president. Why should I be angry with him? We put up with those questions, on the other side, every day.


18 posted on 02/11/2005 12:08:49 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks; prairiebreeze; Mo1; cyncooper; Howlin; All

WHITE HOUSE SPOKESMAN: WHAT IS A REPORTER?
Thu Feb 10 2005 20:49:03 ET

White House spokesman Scott McClellan On Thursday challenged liberal media activists, who are currently feigning outrage over events surrounding "Jeff Gannon," to examine the definition of reporter in the new century.

"In this day and age, when you have a changing media, it's not an easy issue to decide or try to pick and choose who is a journalist. It gets into the issue of advocacy journalism," McClellan said.

"Where do you draw the line? There are a number of people who cross that line in the briefing room.

"There are a number of people in that room that express their points of view, and there are people in that room that represent traditional media, they represent talk radio, they're columnists, and they represent online news organizations."

Developing...


19 posted on 02/11/2005 12:12:04 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
I think the issue is someone operating under an alias (and the alias may have been used to get credentials....we don't know for sure)

Actually, we know for a fact. He got checked under his legal name.

20 posted on 02/11/2005 12:15:26 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson