The people of AZ were fooled into electing this "new democrat" Goddard and the governor...now we get what we deserve until we have a chance throw out the bums.
1 posted on
02/11/2005 6:14:18 AM PST by
Kokojmudd
To: Kokojmudd
Needless to say,this maroon is a DEMOCRAT!
To: Kokojmudd
To: Kokojmudd
Another attempt by the democrats to thwart the will of the people. Just watch, Goddard will invent yet another set of problems to indefinitely delay the voting ID part of proposition 200. He has already limited the public services prohibition of the voter approved proposition. It's time to organize against his reelection in 2006. I am disappointed that the prop 200 proponents are not challenging this ruling.
Disgusted and frustrated.
To: Kokojmudd
Well, in his defense, if they were not allowed to cheat at the ballot box and had to run on their voting record, there is no possible way they could win. Can you be surprised that he wants to stop voter id?
If he didn't, how else would he be able to register Donald Duck as a democrat...or get all those dead people to vote.
7 posted on
02/11/2005 6:27:35 AM PST by
Personal Responsibility
(Liberals hate solving problems because once the problem is solved, you don't need liberals !)
To: Kokojmudd
We were never fooled - the democrats won the state because Christians did not go out in vote. Also the democrats were very smart in putting ballot initiatives (e.g. gaming) at the 2002 election which brought the dems out in big numbers. If we are smart we will put initiiatives on the ballot which will bring out conservatives in 2006. We do not need an AG or Gov who is a RINO - Id rather keep the dems then put in backstabbing RINOs. We need true conservatives who are not afraid of conservative issues and can speak well in public and who get people to smile - another Reagan if you will.
9 posted on
02/11/2005 6:30:59 AM PST by
sasafras
(sasafras (The road to hell is paved with good intentions))
To: Kokojmudd
He expressed particular concern that Indians living in rural areas cannot produce what Brewer said is necessary: identification with a street address. He misspelled Illegals and left out dead, out-of-state, and double voters.
10 posted on
02/11/2005 6:33:02 AM PST by
CPOSharky
(Demoncrat speak - "Bipartisan" is only used when Republicans are the majority.)
To: Kokojmudd
Isn't it the persons responsibility not the state to have the proper documentation to vote?
12 posted on
02/11/2005 6:34:47 AM PST by
edcoil
(Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
To: Kokojmudd; neverdem; Howlin; Congressman Billybob; floriduh voter; sweetliberty
Hey!
The first "fraud" 2005 story I've bookmarked!
(The other 480 fraud stories are bookmarked for democrat fraud in 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004 ....
13 posted on
02/11/2005 6:36:10 AM PST by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Kerry's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: Kokojmudd
Uh, excuse me, but since when does an AG 'set' policy, when it comes to the law?
He has no legal standing by attempting to thwart the will of the people and a law, signed by the governor.
The AG can only enforce the law.
This jerk should be removed from office immediately.
15 posted on
02/11/2005 7:01:19 AM PST by
Bigh4u2
To: Kokojmudd
Goddard also stressed the need for a procedure to deal with voters who show up at the polls without the required identification... That's a tough one, how about advertise the requirements to vote on a regular basis on all media and come the election if someone doesn't produce, send them home?
I believe it's called enforcing the law. Which is what P. 200 was all about anyway. Heaven forbid it "offends" some tantrum prone lib...
16 posted on
02/11/2005 7:16:31 AM PST by
TLI
( . . . ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA . . . . . .)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson