Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: advance_copy
That's not what I said. The WaPo story was POSTED ON FREE REPUBLIC 29 minutes after MD4BUSH's posts, according to the time stamps. The WaPo story may or may not have been posted on the WaPo's website before MD4BUSH's posts. I haven't tried to track down when the WaPo first posted its story on its website. I wouldn't even know how to do so.
391 posted on 02/11/2005 5:20:24 AM PST by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 380 | View Replies ]


To: conservative in nyc
The WaPo story was POSTED ON FREE REPUBLIC 29 minutes after MD4BUSH's posts, according to the time stamps

Correct, that's why I used the phrase "no later than". You are also right in saying that the WaPo web story must have been posted on their web site even before 11:34, and possibly before 11:05. This certainly confirms that WaPo could not have used the public posting by MD4.
396 posted on 02/11/2005 5:24:39 AM PST by advance_copy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 391 | View Replies ]

To: conservative in nyc

If MD4Bush has already passed the info to the WaPo, then in order to avoid being accused of illegal story sourcing he had to post the same content here so if ever caught, he could claim it to have been public domain.


626 posted on 02/11/2005 12:14:52 PM PST by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 391 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson