Posted on 02/10/2005 6:39:50 PM PST by gobucks
Interesting post.
This is my re-read afterwork marker.
In at least 18 states, campaigns have begun to make public schools teach “intelligent design” — a theory that nature is so complex it could only have been created by design — alongside Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution.
A theory based on a fallacy and which states its support in poll numbers. This can only be ID.
Antievolutionism and Creationism in the United States. Great summary of the issues.
Political Challenges to the Teaching of Evolution. American Geological Institute. Interactive map.
Uh huh.
Well, I'm convinced.
"Those who advocate giving it equal treatment in schools have a different interpretation. 'Intelligent design promotes a rational basis for belief in God,' said John Calvert, managing director of the Kansas-based advocacy group Intelligent Design Network Inc."
In other words, ID isn't creationism, it just promotes creationism. Do you see walking and talking ducks too?
http://www.icr.org/starlightandtime/starlightandtime.html
Part of it is here
Thanks, I'll save that and give it a good read.
you have to get the book, though, her website is a tease, not informative.
She is a little excentric, but I do still have her book, and I did copy the footnotes, she didn't lie.
It's more like fighting reality, IMHO.
It is amazing. Science education in this country gets squeezed by both sides. From the left, you have PC-lovers who would rather that the schools focus on women's studies and instilling high self-esteem while on the right you have people trying to replace science with theology.
I imagine, if you go into the average school in China, you have none of this nonsense. All you'll see is a bunch of kids learning science as part of their government's plan to supplant us as the world's #1 power.
Ask him who invented evolution? Who invented the physical laws of the universe?
The only truthful answer is that no one knows. Any other answer is not based on faith. That is, these are religious/philosophical questions, not scientific questions. Any attempted answers taught in school should be in religion or philosophy classes, not in a science class.
I'm sure this came as a surprise on FR. /sarcasm
The state of scientific schooling in our public schools is terrible. We're dooming ourselves to second-tier nation status.
Other than in graduate schools, I think we are already there and rapidly heading to third-tier nation status.
The only bright light is that an intelligent and self-motivated student has access to an enormous quantity of information to read and study and arrive at his/her own conclusions, regardless of what is being taught in our schools/indoctrination centers.
educational placemarker
If this is going to become an educational thread, then I might be interested - otherwise - - - same old, same old....
Quack quack, waddle waddle...
Any other answer is not based on faith.
Self correction: Any other answer is based on faith
Actually Dembski did write one paper a few years ago.
Dembski, William A. Uniform probability. J. Theoret. Probab. 3 (1990), no. 4, 611--626.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.