Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All; wagglebee

While I'm happy about this, he is still pro-abortion.

If he is the Republican Party's nominee in the 2008 election, most pro-lifers probably won't vote for him.


18 posted on 02/10/2005 7:32:15 PM PST by Sun (Slavery was justifed by claiming the victims were not people; abortion is justified that way today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sun
This is a real problem. Most of the heavyweights being bandied about as 2008 contendors - Giuliani, Romney, Rice - are liberals on social issues, including the life ones.

Like it or not, abortion/life issues are the ones that will define us in a historical context: they are the issues whose impact will endure from generation to generation. The impact of the Jewish holocaust are felt even today, and the sore will never completely close. We've killed 7 times as many as Adolph Hitler, and yet have the gall to vilify him. We rightly condemn slavery, but have no leg to stand on because where we condemn practices applied by race we allow (and in some cases celebrate) even worse practices applied by age.

With embryonic stem cell research, human life becomes a trading commodity. Some call this the evolution of the race. I call it reprehensible and damning.

22 posted on 02/10/2005 9:20:43 PM PST by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson