Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

According to the article this only affect new hires.


15 posted on 02/10/2005 4:40:17 PM PST by Tempest (Click on my name for a long list of press contacts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Tempest

If so, then the article is incorrect in that respect. The Governor's plan aims to induce workers presently in the system to "opt out" in exchange for a one time 'bonus'. Those who remain in the system will be required to both pick up the resulting shortfall in those workers' contributions and to pay a portion of what had been the State's contributions.


18 posted on 02/10/2005 4:49:03 PM PST by BenLurkin (Big government is still a big problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Tempest
That's the problem with all these new ideas. The Governor needs to attack all the employees, state and teachers. Why should a state employee have a free ride on the shoulders of the people that they are supposed to help. Also, getting rid of the tenure system for the teachers and make them work for their raises and to keep their jobs is a great idea. Why should a teacher after a certain amount of time get tenure and never worry about losing their job?? No one in the public or private sector should be indispensable. Everyone should have to work hard for their position. I work in the private section. If I don't keep up my standards, I will be looking for a new job, QUICKLY!!. They, the teachers' and public employees should be held to some standard too.
20 posted on 02/10/2005 4:53:35 PM PST by antiunion person (For the Preservation of the United States, WE Need to Close Down the Borders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson