Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EU set to lift China arms embargo despite US concerns
EUObserver ^

Posted on 02/10/2005 10:11:57 AM PST by Alex Marko

BRUSSELS - The European Union on Wednesday (9 February) indicated that it would go ahead and lift its arms embargo on China despite repeatedly expressed concerns by the US.

"The European Union is moving to lift the arms embargo. The European Union cannot be accused of rushing into this", said European Commission President José Manuel Barroso.

Standing beside him during a brief stop on her whirlwind tour of Europe, US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice reiterated the concerns the US has about the EU's intention to lift the embargo - imposed after the massacre of protestors in Tiananmen Square in 1989.

"We have made clear our concerns about the military balance, the fact that there are still American forces in that region", said Ms Rice.

"All we can ask is that the European Union is aware of our concerns, understands them fully and takes them fully into consideration", she added.

The EU is set to lift its embargo within the first half of this year but is in the process of making a general code of conduct on arms sales stricter.

However, Ms Rice also sought to play down differences between the two sides by stressing that Washington feels that it has been listened to.

"I really have to underscore how much the Europeans have tried to take account of our concerns. We are having fruitful discussions with our European allies ... I do feel we are being listened to".

This conciliatory theme was played throughout her trip to Europe which included visits to London, Paris and Berlin.

In an interview with Germany's biggest daily, the tabloid Bild, she spoke of Chancellor Gerhard Schröder being a "friend of America".

In Paris, she gave a keynote foreign policy speech and spoke of a new chapter in transatlantic relations.

At her stopover in Brussels she said that she felt her message was "getting through" even before she began her trip.

"I feel very good about what we have done here", she said in Brussels.

Responding to her, Mr Barroso said, "this visit will symbolise the strong and enduring bonds of transatlantic co-operation that are stronger by far than any differences that may have existed between us".

The seven-day trip to foster good-will in Europe comes just days before US President George W. Bush also makes the transatlantic journey.

He is due in Brussels on 21 February.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Japan; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Russia
KEYWORDS: china; eu; eurabia; eussr; fourthreich; francestinks; nuclear; policyofcash

1 posted on 02/10/2005 10:11:57 AM PST by Alex Marko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Alex Marko

I predict something bad will surface...kinda like how we found out how Chirac had dealings with Iraq.


2 posted on 02/10/2005 10:25:29 AM PST by freebird5850 ("Tell the truth, there's less to remember!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Marko
These leeches got shared tech developments from US and now they want to share the fruits of this to the Chinese.

We need to withdraw from NATO and dirty nuke our bases after we leave them.

3 posted on 02/10/2005 10:27:22 AM PST by Centurion2000 (Nations do not survive by setting examples for others. Nations survive by making examples of others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000

Nato is an instrumental US Foreign Policy enforcer.... but I agree with the military technology...i think we should severe those ties with Europe.


4 posted on 02/10/2005 10:28:57 AM PST by Alex Marko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Thud

And so ends the American special relationship with Britain.


5 posted on 02/10/2005 10:40:07 AM PST by Dark Wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Alex Marko
Time to sh*t-can NATO and any joint weapons development, tactical coordination, and training with any NATO/EU country selling arms to China. Ditto on weapons related technology.
6 posted on 02/10/2005 10:44:15 AM PST by ml1954
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Wing

Please get real.


7 posted on 02/10/2005 2:31:28 PM PST by Tommyjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000

If it hadn't been for the Chinese square massacre the US, under Reagan and Bush Senior, would have continued to sell mil technology to China. Grumman had two Chinese J-8 FINBACK fighters in the US ready for upgrade with US radar and avionics technology. The incident in the square brought about the arms embargo and the two FINBACKS were returned in the mid 1990s. The Chinese turned to the Israelis for the technology that the US denied them.


8 posted on 02/10/2005 2:38:14 PM PST by Tommyjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000

It won't be US supplied technology or weapons, but homegrown. For example radars and other avionics. This won't even be top grade material, but older designs. May I remind you that the US in the late 80's was all too willing to supply radars and avionics to China.


9 posted on 02/10/2005 2:43:23 PM PST by Tommyjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson