Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North Korea Says It Has Nuclear Weapons and Rejects Talks(appeasers deeply saddened)
NYT ^ | 02/10/05 | JAMES BROOKE

Posted on 02/10/2005 6:12:31 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster

February 10, 2005

North Korea Says It Has Nuclear Weapons and Rejects Talks

By JAMES BROOKE

TOKYO, Feb. 10 - In a surprising admission, North Korea's hard-line Communist government declared publicly today for the first time that it has nuclear weapons.

It also said that it will boycott United States-sponsored regional talks designed to end its nuclear program, according to a North Korean Foreign Ministry statement transmitted today by the reclusive nation's wire service.

Pyongyang said it has "manufactured nukes for self-defense to cope with the Bush administration's undisguised policy to isolate and stifle" North Korea, and that it will "bolster its nuclear weapons arsenal."

The statement, considered a definitive policy pronouncement, said that North Korea, led by the reclusive dictator Kim Jong Il, is pulling out of the talks after concluding that the second Bush administration would pursue the "brazen-faced, double-dealing tactics" of dialogue and "regime change."

Four hours before the official Korean Central News Agency transmitted the pullout statement, a top Bush administration official told reporters here that North Korea's return to the nuclear talks was expected by all other participants -the United States, Japan, South Korea, Russia and China.

"The onus is really on North Korea," said John R. Bolton, undersecretary of state for arms control and international security, noting that the last time the parties met was in June.

Referring to North Korea's bomb making capability, he added: "The absence of progress in six-party talks means they are making further progress toward their increased capability."

It is unclear if North Korea is definitively slamming the door to talks or merely trying to raise its price for returning to the bargaining table.

"We are compelled to suspend our participation in the talks for an indefinite period," the statement said, adding that North Korea would only return when "there are ample conditions and atmosphere to expect positive results from the talks."

From Europe, Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice told RTL television of Luxembourg: "The North Koreans should reassess this and try to end their own isolation." A similar appeal came from Japan, America's closest ally in the region.

"It's better to resume them early," Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi told reporters about North Korea's decision to boycott the talks. "It would be in North Korea's interest to make use of the six-party forum."

Overall, the statement was a bucket of cold water for analysts who predicted a resumption of talks this spring. Two groups of American congressmen returned last month from visits to Pyongyang with reports that North Korean officials were hinting at an imminent return to the negotiating table.

President Bush, in his State of the Union message last week, avoided the confrontational rhetoric of past speeches in which he branded North Korea as member of "the axis of evil," alongside Iraq and Iran. This time, in his only reference to Pyongyang, he merely said that he was "working with governments in Asia to convince North Korea to abandon its nuclear ambitions."

But in today's statement, Pyongyang zeroed in on Dr. Rice's testimony last month in her Senate confirmation hearings, where she lumped North Korea with five other dictatorships, calling them "outposts of tyranny."

"The true intention of the second-term Bush administration is not only to further its policy to isolate and stifle the D.P.R.K. pursued by the first-term office, but to escalate it," the statement said, referring to North Korea by its formal name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

Outside critics and defectors say that North Korea is neither democratic nor popular, since it has been ruled for the last 60 years by the Kim family, an avaricious clan that does not permit multiparty elections or the slightest whisper of dissent. Today Pyongyang told the Bush administration to talk to the kinds of North Koreans it likes.

"We advise the U.S. to negotiate with dealers in peasant markets it claims that are to its liking or with representatives of the organization of North Korean defectors on its payroll, if it wishes to have talks," the statement said.

In the same statement, North Korea also attacked Japan for "toeing the U.S. line." Tokyo has been struggling with mounting popular pressure for economic sanctions. On Tuesday, Prime Minister Koizumi personally received a petition calling for sanctions, signed by five million people.

Japanese anger with North Korea rose sharply last month after Pyong- yang delivered to visiting Japanese dip- lomats two boxes of half-cremated re- mains, said to be of a Japanese woman kidnapped from Japan by North Korean agents in the 1970s. DNA analysis showed that the remains were not of the missing Japanese woman, but of two unidentified people. It is unclear if North Korea, which tightly controls in- formation from the outside world, was aware of DNA technology. Its state- ment today charged that Japan had "fabricated the issue of false re- mains over the abduction issue."

Conservative Japanese increasingly say Mr. Koizumi should call the bluff of what they say is a bankrupt state that routinely hides behind scary bluster.

"At first, we should make economic sanctions," Shintaro Ishihara, Tokyo's conservative governor said in an interview this afternoon, just before North Korea's nuclear weapons vow was made public.

"At the second stage, let them bomb Japan with that nasty missile," Mr. Ishihara taunted with sarcasm in his voice as he spoke in his office, in Tokyo's tallest building. "Their missile cannot load a nuclear warhead." Asked what Japan would do in response to a missile attack, Mr. Ishihara merely smiled.

The United States has said that North Korea has up to eight nuclear bombs. But, it has never exploded a nuclear device.

One year ago, Siegfried Hecker, a former director of the nuclear weapons laboratory in Los Alamos, N.M., toured Yongbyon, North Korea's main known nuclear facility. Although North Korea apparently organized the visit to persuade Americans of their nuclear weapons prowess, Dr. Hecker returned home saying that he was not convinced North Korea could build a working nuclear bomb and mount it on a missile.

Half a century after the Korean War, North Korea has not signed a formal peace treaty with South Korea and its main ally, the United States. In September 1991, in an effort to denuclearize the divided peninsula, President George H..W. Bush announced the withdrawal of all American tactical weapons from South Korea, totaling about 100. In December 1991, both Koreas signed a formal agreement pledging not to produce, test or store nuclear weapons.

Over the next decade, South Korea conducted what now appear to be several minor, disconnected experiments in technology related to nuclear weapons. North Korea agreed to seal a plutonium-based nuclear program. But in 2002, an American official confronted Pyongyang with evidence that it had been cheating on its nuclear promises, maintaining a covert uranium enrichment program.

In response, North Korea expelled international inspectors from Yongbyon, announced that it was quitting the Non-Proliferation Treaty, and said it was building up what it ambiguously called its "nuclear deterrent." The six-nation disarmament talks started in Beijing in August 2003, but have not yielded any tangible results.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 6waytalk; declaration; nkorea; northkorea; nuke
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
Kim Jong-il is always there to let us confirm our worst suspicion. He has never failed so far.
1 posted on 02/10/2005 6:12:31 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; OahuBreeze; yonif; risk; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 02/10/2005 6:13:10 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

2 things come to mind:

1) act unilateraly

2) preemptive strike


3 posted on 02/10/2005 6:14:10 AM PST by Vaquero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

to cope with the Bush administration's undisguised policy

amazing how they anticipated Bush policies while developing these weapons during the 90's while Clinton was in office and paying them off for not doing so. (Carter Doctrine)


4 posted on 02/10/2005 6:15:10 AM PST by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

The people are starving while Pugsley Jong Il builds bombs.


5 posted on 02/10/2005 6:18:39 AM PST by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Uh...I declare to the world that I have nuclear weapons too!!! Now, respect me!


6 posted on 02/10/2005 6:19:21 AM PST by Lekker 1 (A government policy to rob Peter to pay Paul can be assured of the support of Paul [G.B. Shaw])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

"Asked what Japan would do in response to a missile attack, Mr. Ishihara merely smiled."

You gotta love that. It's the same way I'd want the U.S. to respond.


7 posted on 02/10/2005 6:20:29 AM PST by EarthBound (Proud to be part of the growing Conservative youth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

"......North Korea's hard-line Communist government declared publicly today for the first time that it has nuclear weapons. ......"

And implied that it is ready to use them and supply them to others to use.

Thank you Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton.


8 posted on 02/10/2005 6:21:39 AM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EarthBound

Well smile, and then hint at the "football".


9 posted on 02/10/2005 6:21:57 AM PST by EarthBound (Proud to be part of the growing Conservative youth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: All

10 posted on 02/10/2005 6:23:19 AM PST by j_k_l
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lekker 1
Re #6

OK, this time we will give you all money FR takes in the next donation drive.:) Next time you should have your own country, army, secret police, and scientists. Then we will give you billions of dollars if you make the same threat.:)

11 posted on 02/10/2005 6:24:32 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero
2 things come to mind: 1) act unilateraly 2) preemptive strike

Good thing you aren't in charge. There are millions of South Koreans in Seoul within artillery range of North Korea. What about them? You're going to hit North Korea without even consulting South Korea? That's nuts.

12 posted on 02/10/2005 6:26:43 AM PST by You Dirty Rats (Mindless BushBot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Last year the Presidents of the US and ROK both stated their policy as NK having nuclear weapons will not be tolerated.

The 'ronery' one has sent the ping-pong ball back to them.

13 posted on 02/10/2005 6:26:54 AM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: j_k_l
So ronery!

14 posted on 02/10/2005 6:28:47 AM PST by Petronski (I'm not all that cranky anymore. Someday I'll say just why.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
AMERICA F@#* YEAH!!!
15 posted on 02/10/2005 6:33:15 AM PST by j_k_l
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats

as well as 60,000 of our kids in Eighth Army/2ID,
mine among them...


16 posted on 02/10/2005 6:33:20 AM PST by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

What is this "ronery" buisness? is it some kind of freeper
code word?


17 posted on 02/10/2005 6:34:31 AM PST by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

The President should immediately appoint a delegation to go to North Korea to talk them out of further weapons development. I'd suggest Bill Clinton, Jimmy Carter and Madeline Allbright since they have already solved this problem once before. Well, didn't they?


18 posted on 02/10/2005 6:38:07 AM PST by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rahbert
Re #17

"ronery" is Kim Jong-il's way of pronouncing "lonely" in the movie "Team America."

19 posted on 02/10/2005 6:38:10 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rahbert

In all seriousness, there's no easy solution. First off, I wonder if Jong-Il is bluffing.

Secondly, China is even more nervous than we are (being next door and all) and probably wouldn't put up with a nuclear NK either.


20 posted on 02/10/2005 6:39:07 AM PST by RockinRight (It's NOT too early to start talking about 2006...or 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson