Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Clemenza

Agree, Diana was at least a ditz. I'm happy that Charles and Camilla can at last tie that knot Though they're old and frayed, they still care for each other and should have been married before Charles married Di. QE2 had her royal scepter in that rotten decision, much to her dismay a few years later when Diana turned out to be a passive-aggressive bi-polar lowlife determined to bring the House of Windsor down to suit her personal need for revenge against poor Charley who always wanted Camilla. Phew!


48 posted on 02/10/2005 3:34:29 AM PST by Veto! (Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Veto!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/4252795.stm

BBC says they will marry April 8. Camilla's title is HRH Duchess of Cornwall. Ok, if they wanna get married...FINE....but why should Camilla be HRH? Diana was the mother to the future king and she didn't get to keep HRH. I don't understand.


50 posted on 02/10/2005 3:36:17 AM PST by PilloryHillary (Can vegetarians eat animal crackers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: Veto!
So you're saying that Diana was at fault for having affairs because her husband was unfaithful? Give me a frickin break. Even a Prince bows down before God when he takes marriage vows. A title does not make him exempt from wedding vows.
65 posted on 02/10/2005 4:18:13 AM PST by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: Veto!

You're "happy" for them? Who on God's green Earth gives a crap???!!!


120 posted on 02/10/2005 1:03:19 PM PST by teenyelliott (Soilent green is made of liberals...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson