I agree with Charles. Let him keep his job for awhile longer and let the light of day expose these radicals on campus' who are out to destroy this country thru the "education" process.
I hear this argument a lot, but I've never understood it. I think you've got to shine the light on the cockroaches then get rid of them.
Churchill has now been exposed. More and more people are aware of what an evil (and yet somehow insipid) man he is. So why keep him around? What's the good of exposing evil if you aren't then going to get rid of it? That's like making sure we keep a few criminals on the street so we don't forget what crime is. No -- you get rid of the criminals one by one. (In any case, it's a never-ending process because there'll always be more, always on display.)
Besides, if Churchill is left alone -- to infect young, impressionable minds -- what message does that send the other Churchills out there? That they can say any sicko thing they like because we'd rather keep them on display than do battle with them?