Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia Says It's Ready to Arm Saudi Arabia
Itar-Tass ^ | February 10, 2005 | Lyuba Pronina

Posted on 02/09/2005 4:29:17 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe

Moscow is preparing its first major defense contract with Saudi Arabia, the world's largest arms buyer that has traditionally spent its petrodollars on U.S.-made weapons.

The deal is part of a strategy aimed at diversifying Russia's arms buyers away from China and India, Sergei Chemezov, general director of state-owned arms exporter Rosoboronexport, told reporters Wednesday.

Russia also signed an arms contract with Morocco last month, he said, the first since the breakup of the Soviet Union.

Chemezov refused to give any details, but said that Russia is stepping up negotiations with Middle Eastern countries for jointly developing air defense systems on the basis of the domestically produced S-300, Buk and Tor-M1 systems.

"If a contract with Saudi Arabia is signed, it will be a landmark event in Russian arms exporting," said Marat Kenzhetayev, an expert with the Center for Arms Control.

From 1991 to 2002, Saudi Arabia imported $93 billion worth of weapons, Kenzhetayev said, while Morocco imported $1 billion.

In that same period of time, Riyadh signed $40 billion worth of arms contracts, of which $28 billion flowed to the United States and not a penny went to Russia, he said.

After U.S.-Saudi relations dampened following the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the situation now seems to be swinging in Russia's favor, Kenzhetayev said.

While Moscow already sells arms to Middle Eastern countries such as the United Arab Emirates, Yemen, Iran, Kuwait and Algeria, a deal with the Saudis could push its neighbors Jordan and Oman to sign Russian contracts as well, Kenzhetayev said.

For Moscow, which sells arms to 59 countries, finding new customers is important as it tries to diversify away from major clients China and India, which account for 80 percent of Russian arms sales.

"We have reached the ceiling of $5 billion to $6 billion in annual arms sales abroad," Chemezov said. "We have to change something drastically."

Last year, Rosoboronexport, which mediates over 90 percent of the country's arms deals, delivered $5.1 billion worth of arms out of $5.8 billion exported by Russia as a whole.

Rosoboronexport has orders of $12 billion through 2007, but Chemezov said that this year Rosoboronexport can expect to make $1 billion less in revenues.

"The reason? Our companies cannot produce more modern weapons. [The industry] is in need of investment either from private companies or from the state," he said. "Today we sell weapons that were designed in the late 1970s and early 1980s."

Rosoboronexport plans to boost control over defense production by placing its directors on the boards of arms makers and buying stakes, Chemezov said.

Chemezov said that all sales are strictly in line with international agreements and do not violate any United Nations sanctions.

"However, if some country, including the United States, makes its own decision [on sanctions], pardon us, we are not obliged to do as America says," Chemezov said.

Last month, Israel and the United States expressed concern about the possible sale of SA-18 surface-to-air missiles to Syria.

Asked whether any such contract was discussed during Syrian President Bashar Assad's recent visit or is planned, Chemezov said: "No."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Russia
KEYWORDS: armsbuildup; geopolitics; middleeast; proliferation; saudiarabia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: EagleUSA

Their main enemy IS Iran.


21 posted on 02/09/2005 4:48:15 PM PST by honest2God
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Russia and France have a lot in common as far as the world stage is concerned. They both had it pretty good for a while (or so they thought), but now they're past it because they can't give up their spent government models. They're both worried about recapturing their former glory and will do anything to grab the attention of other powers provided it's A) a quick and easy way to make money, B) futile, C) insane, or D) just plain stupid.


22 posted on 02/09/2005 4:50:09 PM PST by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stopislamnow; marron

"Something is coming."

1. Might not happen.

2. Russia wants to make money.

3. Might be a "scratch my back" deal to dampen Russian oil exports.


23 posted on 02/09/2005 4:50:45 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: honest2God

Their main enemy IS Iran.
======
I would not bet my life on that...even if appearances might leave that impression...both Iran and SA have a common enemy -- DEMOCRACY.


24 posted on 02/09/2005 4:53:10 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Saudiland needs some kind of defense against Iranian aggression. Let both them and Syria bone up on defensive armaments.


25 posted on 02/09/2005 4:53:17 PM PST by RightWhale (Please correct if cosmic balance requires.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jb6; Destro; MarMema

Ping!


26 posted on 02/09/2005 4:56:15 PM PST by GarySpFc (Sneakypete, De Oppresso Liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

LOL!!!!! I love it!!!!


27 posted on 02/09/2005 4:56:17 PM PST by PeterFinn (Why is it that people who know the least know it the loudest?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Chris_GT

maybe they want to arm their mosques that they have here


28 posted on 02/09/2005 4:57:31 PM PST by sure_fine (*not one to over kill the thought process*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ABG(anybody but Gore)
The Russkies don't make great washing machines, but they can make some pretty good planes. ;^)

Washing machines are machined to automotive tolerances.

Aircraft are built to much higher tolerances.

29 posted on 02/09/2005 4:59:58 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Freedom. Brought to you by the grace of God and the Red, White and Blue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn
Translation: Saudi Arabia is preparing to do something nasty to the USA and they are changing their principle arms supplier.

Everyone in the world knows American weapons are the best. I'd translate this article like this: Saudi Arabia is running out of money.

30 posted on 02/09/2005 5:00:21 PM PST by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot

can ya blame them.........they've got very little besides oil, vodka potatoes and weaponry.......sad state of affairs


31 posted on 02/09/2005 5:01:16 PM PST by NorCalRepub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dakine

Arabs leaders WANT a weak military...it prevents potential coup attempts.

They spend billions on top quality armaments that rot in the sand.

They have nothing better to do with their money, and it gives them 'prestige.'


32 posted on 02/09/2005 5:01:20 PM PST by Guillermo (Dems: Tax and Spend GOP: Borrow and Spend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

Its not a matter of appearances, its a matter of fact-with the exception of the U.S. in Iraq, Iran is the dominant military power in the Gulf, and the Gulf Arabs are worried about Iran's bid for regional supremacy. And democracy is not the Saudis' enemy because we aren't going to try to overturn the Saudi monarchy any time soon (until we limit our dependence on their oil). The internal elements opposing the Saudi regime are primarily Islamists and are not really interested in democracy either. SA is one of our biggest long-term foreign policy problems.


33 posted on 02/09/2005 5:01:39 PM PST by honest2God
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

at least Iran is not two faced about it.....you never ever know who's side SA is on.....plus they and their Maddrasis (SP?) are the real long term problem


34 posted on 02/09/2005 5:04:10 PM PST by NorCalRepub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: honest2God
I agree, Our midterm Saudi alliance will remain solid until Iran reforms and Iraq flourishes.
35 posted on 02/09/2005 5:10:29 PM PST by sanchez810
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot
When I was active duty we had some Saudis and Iranians at our radar school in Great Lakes. Their performance was a little lackluster.

They loved the bars and strip joints in town, though.

36 posted on 02/09/2005 5:15:58 PM PST by exnavy (this space left intentionally blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Stopislamnow
Well, Russia armed Iraq to the teeth and even had advisers there while we attacked, and it took us what, one month to spank them?

Russia struggled for eleven years to take Afghanistan and FAILED, and it took us what, two weeks to do the job?

Russia sucks in the military might department. Did you see how grabasstic and befuddled the Russians soldiers looked during the Beslan horror?

I'm not worried about Russia arming Saudi Arabia.

Neither is competent. Neither can be trusted. Neither is our friend.

Both can go pack sand.
37 posted on 02/09/2005 5:17:46 PM PST by broadsword (Weren't there a couple of giant Buddhist statues in Afghanistan? What happened to them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

We'd better do whatever we can to remain the Saudis' supplier...that way if anything happens, we can disable their weapons via remote control. (then again the Russian weapons will probably just disable themselves if ever used in a battle)


38 posted on 02/09/2005 5:19:48 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Evil incarnate dancing with the DEVIL and you thought all we had to worry about was "MESKINS" jumping the fence!


39 posted on 02/09/2005 5:22:58 PM PST by winker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
General Patton wanted to take out the soviet Union near the end of WWII, but wasn't allowed to......sigh.

He should have done it anyway.

40 posted on 02/09/2005 5:23:21 PM PST by B.O. Plenty (Liberalism is a terminal disease.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson