Your question has nothing to do with the proposal. Therefore it has no bearing on my replies on this thread. Are you a parrot for the chicken little lobby or have you actually read the bill?
Maybe you don't know it but the government already has more information on you than you realize. Site a case where you have been abused other than being taxed to death and I'll listen.
I'm not the one at issue.
I asked you to cite a case where the government actually kept their promises about data protection.
Since you can't, because there isn't such a case, why should the government be trusted with one more bit of information than it already has?
The answer, of course, is that it shouldn't.
Why is that so hard for you to understand?