Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rice Hints U.S. Resigned to EU Ending China [arms] Embargo
reuters.com ^ | Wed Feb 9, 2005 12:44 PM ET | Paul Taylor

Posted on 02/09/2005 10:19:17 AM PST by Destro

Rice Hints U.S. Resigned to EU Ending China Embargo

Wed Feb 9, 2005 12:44 PM ET

By Paul Taylor

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice suggested on Wednesday that the United States was resigned to the European Union lifting its arms embargo on China and felt Europe was taking U.S. security concerns seriously.

Rice told a news conference after meeting NATO foreign ministers: "We are still in discussions ... about how to deal with the prospect of the lifting of the EU arms embargo on China.

"I really have to underscore how much the Europeans have tried to take account of our concerns, how good the discussions have been," she said.

The EU pledged at a summit meeting with China in December to work toward lifting its 15-year-old arms embargo, imposed after Beijing's bloody crackdown on pro-democracy protesters in Tiananmen Square in 1989.

European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso confirmed at a joint news conference with Rice that the 25-nation bloc was moving to end the ban but had taken on board U.S. sensitivities.

"The European Union cannot be accused of rushing into this," he said. "We agree with the United States that no one has any interest in substantially increasing the quantity or the quality of the weaponry in southeast Asia."

A voluntary code of conduct on EU arms exports was being updated to take account of these issues, Barroso said.

CONCILIATORY TONE

Rice said Washington continued to have worries, but her tone was conciliatory, in contrast to past public U.S. warnings against any EU loosening of the embargo.

"The United States has very specific concerns about the lifting of the embargo having to do with human rights, Tiananmen ... we do have to worry about the military balance in that region and we have concerns about technology and technology transfer," she said.

The U.S. House of Representatives urged President Bush in a non-binding resolution last week to press EU leaders to reconsider, threatening unspecified restrictions on transatlantic defense cooperation if the embargo was lifted.

The motion, passed by a vote of 411-3, deplored a recent increase in arms sales by EU states to China and said lifting the embargo would "place European security policy in direct conflict with United States security interests."

Irish Prime Minister Bertie Ahern said last month he expected the ban to be lifted by the middle of this year.

French President Jacques Chirac has been the most determined EU leader in pushing to scrap the embargo, but even Britain, Washington's closest EU ally, has swung behind ending the ban.

Chinese leaders say they want the ban lifted because it is an unfair obstacle in relations, not because it wants to go on an arms buying spree.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; eu; walmartisyourfriend
Irony is that they will purchase said weapons with American dollars.
1 posted on 02/09/2005 10:19:17 AM PST by Destro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Destro
What can we do about it?
2 posted on 02/09/2005 10:24:13 AM PST by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy

Jack. In fact I predict as soon as the EU gets juicy military contracts American arms makers will lobby Congress for teh right to sell China their wares.


3 posted on 02/09/2005 10:28:31 AM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Destro

Screw that BS. Europe should receive an ultimatum - you have an arms trade with China, or one with the USA, but not both. Let's see how they like the idea of facing Russian armored divisions with Chinese tech.


4 posted on 02/09/2005 10:29:30 AM PST by thoughtomator (reporting from Cylon-occupied Caprica)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

What about America's role in making China rich enough to afford said quality arms? Once you let China into the WTO and make China your free trade partner what justification the exists for an arms embargo? That your scared she might knock you off the world power perch?


5 posted on 02/09/2005 10:32:38 AM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Destro
Jack. In fact I predict as soon as the EU gets juicy military contracts American arms makers will lobby Congress for teh right to sell China their wares.

Yes. And probably all ready happening.

6 posted on 02/09/2005 10:34:24 AM PST by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Destro

The closer they get to our level of capability, the more likely they will provoke a war. Thus, if you don't want a potentially nuclear war between the US and China (and I would guess most of Europe outside France doesn't want that), such a policy makes perfect sense.


7 posted on 02/09/2005 10:38:35 AM PST by thoughtomator (reporting from Cylon-occupied Caprica)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Destro

Rewind to 1939.


8 posted on 02/09/2005 10:41:39 AM PST by Reagan Disciple (Peace through Strength)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Destro
"Irony is that they will purchase said weapons with American dollars."

You know if the American Dollar wasn't artifically tied to the Chinese Yuan. We'd really be getting our butts kicked by the Euro worse than it is now.

9 posted on 02/09/2005 10:45:29 AM PST by Tempest (Click on my name for a long list of press contacts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tempest

That is another irony also!


10 posted on 02/09/2005 10:49:32 AM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

Quite right. China, for its part, is wargaming to defeat the U.S. Navy in its littoral waters during a Taiwan invasion. We have to game to disrupt the invasion while forcing the PLAN to come out into the Phillipine Sea and play our ballgame AWAY from the reach of the PLAAF. The extent to which the Europeans give the Chinese standoff capability puts a crimp in our planning.

We'll need to wrap things up in Iraq over the next couple of years before things heat up in the Pacific. Expect no moves before the Beijing Olympics.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

11 posted on 02/09/2005 10:50:37 AM PST by section9 (Major Motoko Kusanagi says, "Jesus is Coming. Everybody look busy...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

How on Earth can we tell them that after the Clinton administration already sold missile guidance technology to the Chinese?


12 posted on 02/09/2005 11:20:12 AM PST by Publius Scipio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Destro

There has been a large camp for that exact thing in DC for quite some time.


13 posted on 02/09/2005 11:22:12 AM PST by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii

M1A Abrams to China - think of the profit margins!


14 posted on 02/09/2005 11:40:46 AM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii
Thinking lke a lobbyost for the arms indusrty ----

with America switching over to the new generation of fighter jets - we need a market for the still excellent F-16 and F-15 fighters. Think of the jobs saved in your district Senator!

15 posted on 02/09/2005 11:50:19 AM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson