[Clint N. Suhks]

Yes, I liked that quote too...and almost posted it myself. I work in the legal profession, so I'm fairly familiar with some of the procedures.

Yeah, I can't believe there is no voir dire process for peer review...and this crap has been going on since 1973? There needs to be and investigation. This Regent article is justification for one. It's a blatant conspiracy that needs to be exposed. OMG

[nicmarlo]

There needs to be and investigation. This Regent article is justification for one. It's a blatant conspiracy that needs to be exposed.

I agree.

[EdReform]

and this crap has been going on since 1973? There needs to be and investigation. This Regent article is justification for one. It's a blatant conspiracy that needs to be exposed.

As I said in reply 44 above, the homosexual activists knew exactly what they were doing in the days leading up to the removal of homosexuality from the DSM.

The infiltration of the 'professional' medical and scientific associations by homosexual activists was ( and continues to be ) part of a well planned and well financed campaign to redefine homosexuality as normal. Forcing the removal of homosexuality from the DSM was the homosexual community's greatest achievement.