I guess I just think you all were being extremely harsh on him.
He served our country honorably, and I don't think he should be spoken to in that manner.
It was he who was being harsh. He had no business attacking Limbaugh on this thread.
Unless you can tell me what he was getting at, because I still can't figure it out.
He served our country honorably, and I don't think he should be spoken to in that manner.
I'm not sure I understand what that has to do with it. If he makes a statement that is incorrect, there is no reason whatsoever not to correct it.
I know of at least a dozen FReepers who have served, some in combat, who have NEVER, EVER mentioned it. They don't see it as relevant to the discussion. As it shouldn't be. The past does not exempt someone from criticism.
But I appreciate your civil tone. Thanks for letting me explain.