Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sistani 'not seeking Islamic law'
BBC ^

Posted on 02/09/2005 8:34:11 AM PST by Alex Marko

A spokesman for Iraq's most influential Shia cleric has denied reports that the cleric is demanding that Islam be the country's sole source of law. Hamed Khafaf said Ayatollah Ali Sistani believes Iraq's new constitution should respect what he described as the Islamic cultural identity of Iraqis.

Shia success in the election led to speculation that the ayatollah wanted a constitution based on Sharia law.

Mr Khafaf said the speculation was baseless.

He insisted that Ayatollah Sistani's position had not changed.

In Ayatollah Sistani's view, his spokesman went on to say, it was up to the elected representatives of the people in the new National Assembly to decide the details.

Mr Khafaf said the ayatollah had approved the current wording of Iraq's interim constitution, which states that Islam is a source of legislation and no law contradicting Islamic tenets may be passed.

Reports at the weekend that prominent Iraqi Shia clerics were now pushing for a constitution based solely on Islamic Sharia law caused concern among Iraqi secular and Kurdish leaders.

BBC regional analyst Sadeq Saba says the statement by Ayatollah Sistani's spokesman suggests that the ayatollah has no intention of turning Iraq into an Iranian-style theocracy.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iraq; iraqidemocracy; mediastupidity; shia; shiite; sistani

1 posted on 02/09/2005 8:34:11 AM PST by Alex Marko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Alex Marko

I told you guys its BS....The reports that sistani wants a theocracy based on islam were fabricated and blown out of proportion by the media upset with bush being vindicated by the iraqi elections.


2 posted on 02/09/2005 8:35:04 AM PST by Alex Marko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Marko

He's been saying this all along.

Media rumors were precisely that. Promoted with the usual agenda.

Paranoid Freepers take note.


3 posted on 02/09/2005 8:35:13 AM PST by PianoMan (and now back to practicing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PianoMan

That's fine for Sistani. The Iraqi constitution needs a clause separating religion from state to prevent future encroachments of Sharia.


4 posted on 02/09/2005 8:38:55 AM PST by Rutles4Ever (This is my tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Alex Marko
no law contradicting Islamic tenets may be passed.

Dangerous opening here...

5 posted on 02/09/2005 8:47:10 AM PST by Peter vE (Ceterum censeo: delenda est Carthago.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peter vE
"no law contradicting Islamic tenets may be passed.

Dangerous opening here..."

Definately. Not supporting can be construed as contradicting. For example, could a law that allows freedom of religion be accepted under these pretenses?
6 posted on 02/09/2005 8:57:32 AM PST by ElectionTracker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Alex Marko

Yep! I called the NY Times article out for the enemy propaganda it is.


7 posted on 02/09/2005 9:16:48 AM PST by thoughtomator (reporting from Cylon-occupied Caprica)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson