Fruit flies are a favorite topic around here. Everybody be nice.
To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
EvolutionPing |
A pro-evolution science list with over 230 names. See list's description at my homepage. FReepmail to be added/dropped. |
|
|
|
2 posted on
02/09/2005 7:37:06 AM PST by
PatrickHenry
(<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
To: PatrickHenry
We like to use a Christmas tree analogy, said Carroll. These systems already have all the structural details in place, like the structure of a Christmas tree. And all evolution has to do is to alter these regulatory elements mutationally to bring out a pattern like hanging ornaments on the tree.
I'm confused. Is this micro- or macro-evolution? Given this analogy, it seems the former is the case.
3 posted on
02/09/2005 7:42:09 AM PST by
mike182d
To: PatrickHenry
These systems already have all the structural details in place."
Good Design.
6 posted on
02/09/2005 7:49:40 AM PST by
DannyTN
To: PatrickHenry
7 posted on
02/09/2005 8:17:56 AM PST by
MonroeDNA
(US OUT of the UN!)
To: PatrickHenry
I think there is a fly in the ointment.
14 posted on
02/09/2005 8:57:14 AM PST by
hgro
To: PatrickHenry
Co-opting is central to the success of such an evolutionary mechanism, said Carroll. A key concept here is that this novelty arose from new combinations of old parts, he said. "The Designer" virtually never designs anything really new. That makes perfect evolutionary sense, but far less ID sense.
To: PatrickHenry
The little guy on the far left is kind of pretty.
47 posted on
02/09/2005 2:56:50 PM PST by
pharmamom
(Ping me, Baby.)
To: PatrickHenry
My pet drosophila melanogaster recently morphed into an anteater. Gee, Darwin was right!
54 posted on
02/13/2005 6:05:56 PM PST by
Doc Savage
(...because they stand on a wall, and they say nothing is going to hurt you tonight, not on my watch!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson