I've read through the so-called "got him!" articles. What I perceive is most upsetting, the red herring, to liberals is.. first their allegation that Jeff is living a double-life. one as gay; the other speaking out against GAY MARRIAGE. That's my take on why they are attacking him. It's the "gay marriage" thingee..
I don't think Jeff is gay. I absolutely DO NOT believe that "gay" photo is Jeff, and the red-herring over the "soup lines". It is a red-herring. Jeff said quite up front in his question that he was quoting Rush Limbaugh.
Liberals for 30 years have been using "anonymous" sources to bolster a need for MORE TAXES, and have gotten away with that. Remember that AP story about the guy claiming to be former SEAL, speaking out against the WOT? He wasn't a NAVY seal. Did AP print the retraction? Demand the reporter be fired? Nope.
The issue, in my own analysis, is the "gay marriage" thingie. If I'm not mistaken -- I think this is the promise of the liberal wing of the Democrat party -- that they will run "gay marriage" is their overall theme. Just ask Mr. dean.
And the "alleged" (insidiously by association rumor) fact over "shared" domain names -- is just so, ridiculous and presumes EVERYONE ON THE INTERNET doesn't understand that one can sometimes share space with others unlike yourself.
And didn't the major newsies just win another round over "right to protect our [anonymous] sources"?
Yeah. I thought the "timing" of all this was most, um, interesting..
Yep - a lot of false insinuations can be made via that approach.