[WildTurkey]

You used the same mis-statement that the infamous "sticker" used, "only a theory" by implying that since it was "only a theory" it did not have full support of the scientific community.

Don't give me that "innocent what did I do, post", you did that knowing full well you were bearing false witness.

[Jaysun]

You used the same mis-statement that the infamous "sticker" used, "only a theory" by implying that since it was "only a theory" it did not have full support of the scientific community.
Don't give me that "innocent what did I do, post", you did that knowing full well you were bearing false witness.

Listen to yourself! "implying that since it was "only a theory" it did not have full support of the scientific community." Since when has "full support of the scientific community" made a rat's ass in determining what is fact and what is theory? Is science some kind of democratic process in which the idea with the greatest number of votes wins?

By the way, I have no idea what the "sticker" is.

Oh, and you've yet to answer my question. How in the hardy hell can you run evolution through the scientific method machine and call it anything more than a (fill in whatever you'd like here)?