Scientists find missing link between whale and its closest relative, the hippo

UC Berkeley News ^ | 24 January 2005 | Robert Sanders, Media Relations

[King Prout]

ok, assuming that your post was correctly addressed to me, I must ask:

Exactly what kind of drug did you use for lunch?
How could you POSSIBLY err so badly as to conclude that I stand on the creationist side of this discussion?
Are you incapable of discriminating a side discussion from the main thread?
Did you not notice the several dozen pro-evo posts I have made in this 1,100+ reply thread?

[shubi]

This is a test of the CBN (Creationut Broadcasting Network). Do not adjust your sets. This is an actual picture from 65 million BC.

[Junior]

Science never makes a mistake...

Science has a built-in cross-checking system that minimizes any mistakes.

[King Prout]

congrats!

[shubi]

It says sound science, not just any old claim to be science (ID, creation science, anything from AIG, ID or ICR etc)

I have some sound interpretations of Scripture that comport with sound science.

But your continued attempts to tar me with the brush of apostasy because I use reason and knowledge of Hebrew to come up with consistent readings of Genesis are annoying.

It is creationists who are apostate idolaters.

[Junior]

Where's Raquel Welch in the leather bikini?

[King Prout]

yeah, what HE said!

[houeto]

I don't hate creationists. I am dismayed by their distraction from Christianity.

shubi, as a minister of the Gospel, you are a creationist.

[shubi]

Isn't she beautiful?

[King Prout]

for a 'Can, sure.

[shubi]

No, believing in a Creator is not the same as a creationist who is a literalist and fundamentalist nutcase.

[shubi]

Our joke was, the only thing holding her together were the cockroaches holding hands.

[houeto]

Actually, W bought T's patents for $1 million plus $1 per installed horsepower but Tesla blew his own money by bad management.

WHAT?!?!?

Where are your sources??? WHERE are your sources?!?!

< /justjoking>

[Junior]

Found this on Wikipedia

[houeto]

You've already stated that it is possible that Christ was mistakenly quoted in the Bible (“Another explanation is that someone else said this and it was attributed to Christ.”) and that the Genesis account of the Flood is “nonsense”.

Yup, if we don't have the Bible to go by, we have nothing. What then would be the basis for shubi's ministry?

[King Prout]

oooooooo!

[King Prout]

yeah, that'd be the image

[muir_redwoods]

And the science, which you dismiss so cavalierly, is something good people spend years learning. They interpret these bones (actually fossils) and from their interpretation and reasoned scientific judgement, peer reviewed in journals by equally educated people, they announce finding and further the study on paleontology. I'm very sorry for you if you cannot accept such findings because it doesn't fit between the covers of an ancient book you revere as divinely inspired.

Personally I would never presume to limit G-d's ability to find ways to create but perhaps you feel you have the right to do so.

[houeto]

Yes, and especially since they use your "falsified gravity" theories.

You are the first one to name it "falsified gravity theory".

[MHalblaub]

Newton's theory is limited.
You can't describe all gravitation effects right with this theory. For some people here this would falsified the whole theory.