To: cynicom
I still wonder why this scenario is a lauded rite of passage. If it were a male teacher and a teen girl, I bet the men on this thread would want him strung up.
To: rintense; wardaddy
Because it's different for boys than for girls.
160 posted on
02/08/2005 9:06:32 PM PST by
cyborg
(Department of Homelife Security threat level is GREEN.)
To: rintense
Of course,
we're hypocrites .....that said
I have seen highly sexual mid adolescents when I was in that peer group who did similar things. It was usually for attention from men when 14-15 year old girls did "it" with mid 20s guys. The reverse was rare but happened to me ironically...or maybe not ironically.
I think society views the ramifications differently but that is not always true either.In the poorer parts of the Mississippi Delta the average age that a young unmarried black girl began having children used to be 13-14 before welfare reform. That was not right but it was common.
My cousin is an OB nurse there and has seen 20 year olds with 5-6 children.
My grandmother married at 14 to my 17 year old grandpa back in the 1910s.
I sure don't think this girl deserves 100 years. Nor would I think a man would either were it reversed and consensual...but I do think the consequences could be worse for the girl....more often than not.
163 posted on
02/08/2005 10:15:56 PM PST by
wardaddy
(I don't think Muslims are good for America....just a gut instinct thing.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson