To: phoenix0468
Welcome to the Canteen phoenix.
By far I think Stanley Kubricks film 2001 or whatever it was called was probably the worst Sci-Fi since, since, ... ever.
1,204 posted on
02/08/2005 8:36:53 PM PST by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: SandRat
Yes, it definitely did not do the book justice. But the sequel, 2010 was much better. None of that surrealistic stuff in that one.
Although I liked 2001: A Space Odyssey, I can understand why many didn't like it. Especially if you read the book. I would say that it did the best it could at the time with the limitations in FX, but it still lacked quite a lot of content from the book.
1,207 posted on
02/08/2005 8:41:29 PM PST by
phoenix0468
(One man with courage is a majority. (Thomas Jefferson))
To: SandRat
I think Stanley Kubricks film 2001 or whatever it was called was probably the worst Sci-Fi since, since, ... ever.You've obviously never seen
![](http://images.amazon.com/images/P/6305760403.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg)
1,208 posted on
02/08/2005 8:43:01 PM PST by
mylife
(The roar of the masses could be farts)
To: SandRat
Stanley Kubricks film Space Odyssey 2001
Aww, good Sci-Fi!!!!!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson