Evolution is science. It is both fact and theory, in that evolution has happened, and the modern synthesis is the theory that explains how. It has shown by the millions of points of data that support it. Creationism is nothing more than a bronze-age, Middle Eastern myth that only children and the pathetically ignorant believe to be literally true.
You have just insulted a lot of people. Why do you think you have all the answers?
Seems that WildHorse crash dinged your brainbox -when you
have something worth listening to I will listen. But your
IGNORANCE and Unbelief are UnAmerican.
"Creationism is nothing more than a bronze-age, Middle Eastern myth that only children and the pathetically ignorant believe to be literally true."
Not really true, I am an evolutionist AND a creationist and I think the physics backs me up. Before you say I am unscientific, remember, the Big Bang is a creationist event, vitual particals are quantum creationist events and current string theory has been known to postulate colliding 'Branes' that set off the creation of new universes.
I think it is time for a synthesis of the two ideas (Crevo) and the development of an "Intelligent Design" theory that makes scientific sense.
Impossible you say? Well, the universe itself may be a sentient creature - it has a memory (that's what we are looking at through Hubble), a nervous system (light rays arry information), a sense of self (gravitation literally holds it together [more or less]), and a strict sense of logic (that's what the conservative laws of physics are).
Consequently, while I'm eager to depose anti-evolutionist fallacies, I think it is a bit too soon to give up on Intelligent Design scenarios. In a sense, ID is a truism, it is clear that our set of physical laws and the particular matter of the universe have had an Attractor towards the creation of stable organisms from the onset, as if the universe were destined to create us.
I just think there is a higher level of discussion possible on this forum once some subset of us decides to develop a theory that uses both evolutionary and ID theories together.
Therefore, I suggest a new term: CREVOLUTION and propose some of us are actually crevolutionists.
Where's the missing link? Where are the intermediate species?