Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JohnnyM

I am stating that from a literal perspective, Genesis is in error. There still is no conflict between the basic concepts between the two. There is no explicit denial of one from the other. It is in the interpetation that the conflict, for some, exists. Evolution describes populations of living things changing over time. No reference to supernatural interference. The Bible simply acknowledges a higher power but does not deny the operation of physical principles.


241 posted on 02/07/2005 9:33:04 AM PST by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies ]


To: doc30
"There still is no conflict between the basic concepts between the two."

Yes there is. Birds were created before land animals. The Sun was created on Day 4 after the plants. Woman created from man. The basic building blocks of evolution are at odds with this.

God uses the term morning and evening with reference to each day. How can this "figuratively" translate.

How can God creating the Sun on the 4th day "figuratively" translate.

If the ordering of events isnt to be taken literally or in that order then how do they "figuratively" translate.

JM
256 posted on 02/07/2005 9:42:15 AM PST by JohnnyM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson