Posted on 02/07/2005 3:50:28 AM PST by PatrickHenry
Communists also wore clothes and ate food. I guess if the communists did it, it must automatically be evil.
And, BTW, the Soviet Union did not adopt the TOE. If anything, scientists who supported the TOE would find themselves in trouble with the authorities.
You can always answer "I don't know".
I'm certain I do. However, I cannot show any evidence for such, so I can't claim it as a difference between humans and other great apes. Do you have anything we can concretely point to and say, "humans have this but great apes don't?"
Wow, I had always heard that your heart stopped when you sneezed so people said bless you because you could die. Learn something new every day on here.
Actually, our DNA is slightly different.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but evolution is neither pro-God or anti-God. It is a scientific theory that does not ponder the existence, guidance or necessity of God. Evolution makes no mention of divinity. That's why creationism is a dangerous - it attempts to wedge the supernatural into a subject independent of it. Where does the Bible say evolution is anti-God? Which scripture? I haven't seen it. Like I said in my previous post, the anti-science (not just anti-evolution) thought prevelant in certain religious conservatives is very dangerous to the future competitiveness of America.
The TOE has nothing to do with religion, except in the minds of fanatics.
Is there a full moon tonight?
You are either ignorant of what the TOE really says, or you are a liar. Which one is it?
If you look at the insignia of the Medical Science. You will see a snake on a pole.And the source for that symbol was the Bible.
Nope. That symbol comes from Classical Greek mythology. Try again.
Nope. Humans are still great apes.
Which humans?
All of us.
And from whence does the schoolmaster come? He was once a student. If you want to treat creationism as sciene, then you must answer where the creator came from? Someone else posted it quite elegantly when they said that the notion of complexity in biology implies a creator. The problem is that where does a necessarily more complicate creator (who created something less complicated) come from? Answer what the nature of that origin and you will begin to open creationsim up to the standards of science. Otherwise, it needs to be treated as religion.
Evolution is a godless religion that claims there is NO God.
No such claim is made in evolution, not any other branch od science. As a matter of fact, no science topic acknowledges God. Therefore, any science that lacks a reference to God, must be anti-God, and is a atheistic religion in your view. Therefore, all science must be wiped from school cirriculums, according to your own logic.
and your reference to the medical symbology comes from Greek mythology, not the Bible. Again, this is another example of how certain fundamentalist Christian preaching has warped not only science, but history as well.
The TOE does not address the Bible in any way.
Well, for one thing, the Bible clearly states that God created man and woman separate from other animals.
That is the silliest post I have ever read.
A spoken language.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.