I think Ward Churchill is a terrorist. I've had his number for a long time. I dispise him.
He doesn't just have radical views, he advocates violence instead of working in a democracy.
He hates the US. And he trashes Indian leaders and puppets and stooges. He is always intimidating people.
Worse of all, a lot of uninformed people will think that Indians really think that he does--which they DON'T!!!
as you posted, the indians don't want anything to do with churchill.
that's probably a story in itself.
there's something odd about tenure that allows psychopaths to go on and on and on.
when tanya harding was convicted of violence, her skating career was over.
not so, ward churchill. he can pretty much do what he wants.
According to an article posted on www.townhall.com, Churchhill claims to be an Indian, but he has never produced any proof of Indian descent or membership in a tribe. When the U of C was asked how he made tenure without a PhD, the university said it was because he had so many publications. Research on that point revealed that at the time he was granted tenure, he had exactly two publications of which one was a two page book review criticizing the FBI. He has since published three books, but they are published by radical fringe book publishers.
The article went on to say that he also claims to be a member of the American Indian Movement, and has made his career on being invited by other liberals to speak about the "genocide against his people" by the evil U.S.
. . .apparently, like most Liberals; he is more than a bit pathological when it comes to the truth.
Despite his claims; the Indians insist. . .he is NO Indian; the truth appears to be that he cannot honestlyclaim his 1/16th desired heritage.
Well why doesn't someone intimidate him back; a straight right to start would seem to be in order, and a query would you care for more?
Immediately after his plane landed in Chicago, he called Students for a Democratic Society, and became an organiser with them. He lived in Peoria, Illinois and had a room-mate who was a Black Panther, named Mark Clark.
How VERY interesting!!!
Quote from the article:
".......Churchill does not advocate a shift from pacifism (especially if practiced in the purest form) to some kind of 'culture of violence'. He is merely suggesting that left-wing and/or anti-imperialist movements should feel free to keep all options open, from rallies and petitions to armed self-defence to armed struggle and that this should be accepted by those who are not directly involved but who support the oppressed.......".
So let me get this straight, he doesn't support violence except where he deems violence is necessary to accomplish his philosophical goals.
Huh?
Weasel words.